SHE vs. XLF
SHE (SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while XLF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SHE returned 12.78%/yr vs 13.72%/yr for XLF. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
SHE vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHE achieves a 16.68% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, SHE has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 12.78%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.72% annualized return.
SHE
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 1.20%
- YTD
- 16.68%
- 6M
- 16.31%
- 1Y
- 28.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 12.78%
XLF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- -1.95%
- 1Y
- 7.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
SHE vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 16.68% | 15.50% | 23.35% | 22.37% | -21.73% | 15.17% | 17.93% | 23.63% | -3.48% | 19.56% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -0.77% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHE and XLF is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2016 | 0.72 |
The correlation between SHE and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.72 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SHE vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHE
XLF
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
SHE
XLF
Financial Services
SHE
XLF
Consumer Cyclical
SHE
XLF
-
Communication Services
SHE
XLF
-
Healthcare
SHE
XLF
-
Industrials
SHE
XLF
Consumer Defensive
SHE
XLF
-
Energy
SHE
XLF
-
Utilities
SHE
XLF
-
Real Estate
SHE
XLF
-
Basic Materials
SHE
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHE vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
SHE
XLF
SHE vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.10 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | 0.52 | +2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.91 | 1.33 | +11.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHE vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHE drawdown since its inception was -35.80%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHE and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.80% | -82.69% | +46.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.54% | -14.79% | +6.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.07% | -15.54% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.69% | -25.81% | -5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.80% | -42.86% | +7.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.98% | -3.64% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.28% | -19.99% | +13.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 5.79% | -3.62% |
Volatility
SHE vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF (SHE) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 4.12%. This indicates that SHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHE | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.16% | 4.12% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.03% | 11.27% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.46% | 14.62% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 18.58% | -1.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.06% | 22.11% | -4.05% |
SHE vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SHE vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
SHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than XLF's 1.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHE SPDR SSGA Gender Diversity Index ETF | 1.09% | 1.18% | 1.14% | 1.37% | 1.54% | 0.99% | 1.24% | 1.91% | 7.39% | 5.37% | 6.41% | 0.00% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.50% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHE and XLF have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHE has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to XLF (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHE dropped -35.80% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 13.72% vs 12.78% for SHE. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 4.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 13.72% return vs 12.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHE.
XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 1.09% for SHE.
SHE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XLF is Financials Equities. SHE tracks SSGA Gender Diversity (TR), while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHE and 0.08% for XLF.
SHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHE and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer