SHDG vs. QFLR

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

SHDG (Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF) and QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHDG is a Options Trading fund actively managed by SoundWatch Capital, while QFLR is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SHDG returned 10.89% vs 15.23% for QFLR. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SHDG charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for QFLR.

Performance

SHDG vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF (SHDG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHDG achieves a 3.73% return, which is significantly lower than QFLR's 4.20% return.

SHDG

• 1D: 1.20%
• 1M: 2.60%
• 6M: 2.72%
• YTD: 3.73%
• 1Y: 10.89%
• 3Y*: 12.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.57%

QFLR

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 0.22%
• 6M: 2.47%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 1Y: 15.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	$2.65M	$2.37M	$2.33M
SHDG Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF	$64.49K	$89.27K	$138.51K

SHDG vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SHDG Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF	3.73%	11.46%	17.61%
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	4.20%	17.27%	16.30%

Correlation

The correlation between SHDG and QFLR is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024	0.83

The correlation between SHDG and QFLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

SHDG vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SHDG

SHDG Risk / Return Rank: 46
SHDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
SHDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
SHDG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
SHDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SHDG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QFLR

QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 42
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 38
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SHDG vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF (SHDG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHDG	QFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.10	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	1.55	+0.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.20	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.93	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.04	6.48	-0.45

SHDG vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHDG Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHDG and QFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHDG vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHDG drawdown since its inception was -15.82%, which is greater than QFLR's maximum drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHDG and QFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHDG	QFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.82%	-13.97%	-1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-7.93%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.99%	+2.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.69%	-2.56%	+0.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.81%	2.35%	-0.54%

Volatility

SHDG vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF (SHDG) is 3.11%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that SHDG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHDG	QFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	5.31%	-2.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.63%	11.35%	-5.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.08%	14.04%	-5.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.86%	13.42%	-2.56%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.86%	13.42%	-2.56%

SHDG vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHDG has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

SHDG vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

SHDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, while QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF	0.00%	0.02%	0.03%	0.00%	0.00%
SHDG Soundwatch Hedged Equity ETF	0.48%	0.49%	0.62%	1.24%	0.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHDG and QFLR in my portfolio?

SHDG and QFLR have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHDG or QFLR?

QFLR has higher volatility (5.31%) compared to SHDG (3.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHDG dropped -15.82% vs QFLR's -13.97%.

Which ETF is better, SHDG or QFLR?

On 1-year performance, QFLR leads with 15.23% vs 10.89% for SHDG. On fees, SHDG is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, SHDG has been the lower-risk option at 3.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SHDG or QFLR?

Over the 1-year period, QFLR has performed better with a 15.23% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SHDG or QFLR?

SHDG is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SHDG or QFLR?

SHDG has the higher dividend yield at 0.48%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

What is the main difference between SHDG and QFLR?

SHDG is categorized as Options Trading, while QFLR is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: SoundWatch Capital and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for SHDG and 0.89% for QFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHDG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.