PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHAZ vs. RSP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHAZ vs. RSP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAZ achieves a 3,717.84% return, which is significantly higher than RSP's 12.08% return.


SHAZ

1D
-0.88%
1M
0.60%
6M
3,717.84%
YTD
3,717.84%
1Y
46,986.67%
3Y*
88.17%
5Y*
10Y*

RSP

1D
-0.22%
1M
0.43%
6M
8.07%
YTD
12.08%
1Y
18.92%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAZ vs. RSP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHAZ
SharonAI Holdings Inc
3,717.84%6,066.67%-99.73%6.31%3.88%1.48%
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
12.08%11.21%12.79%13.70%-11.62%1.57%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAZ and RSP is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2021

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHAZ vs. RSP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAZ
SHAZ Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

RSP
RSP Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
RSP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RSP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
RSP Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
RSP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
RSP Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAZ vs. RSP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHAZRSPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+43.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+33.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

7.60

1.29

+6.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1,736.54

2.42

+1,734.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4,209.10

9.17

+4,199.93

SHAZ vs. RSP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAZ Sharpe Ratio is 44.79, which is higher than the RSP Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAZ and RSP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHAZ vs. RSP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAZ drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, which is greater than RSP's maximum drawdown of -59.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAZ and RSP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHAZRSPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.78%

-59.92%

-39.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.73%

-7.85%

-36.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.78%

-17.81%

-81.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.81%

-0.94%

-22.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.39%

-6.62%

-28.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.75%

2.07%

+15.68%

Volatility

SHAZ vs. RSP - Volatility Comparison

SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) has a higher volatility of 37.99% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) at 3.05%. This indicates that SHAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHAZRSPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.99%

3.05%

+34.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

294.14%

8.63%

+285.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1,734.37%

11.80%

+1,722.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1,799.63%

16.19%

+1,783.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1,799.63%

18.28%

+1,781.35%

Dividends

SHAZ vs. RSP - Dividend Comparison

SHAZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RSP
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
1.51%1.64%1.52%1.64%1.82%1.28%1.64%1.69%2.02%1.52%1.20%1.70%
SHAZ
SharonAI Holdings Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHAZ and RSP have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHAZ has higher volatility (37.99%) compared to RSP (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAZ dropped -99.78% vs RSP's -59.92%.

SHAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (44.79 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHAZ and RSP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer