SHAZ vs. MU

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

SHAZ (SharonAI Holdings Inc) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — SHAZ in Information Technology Services, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past 3 years, SHAZ returned 88.17%/yr vs 142.55%/yr for MU. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SHAZ vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHAZ achieves a 3,717.84% return, which is significantly higher than MU's 217.02% return.

SHAZ

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 3,717.84%
• YTD: 3,717.84%
• 1Y: 46,986.67%
• 3Y*: 88.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: -8.02%
• 1M: -16.87%
• 6M: 171.43%
• YTD: 217.02%
• 1Y: 654.08%
• 3Y*: 142.55%
• 5Y*: 65.36%
• 10Y*: 53.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHAZ vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	3,717.84%	6,066.67%	-99.73%	6.31%	3.88%	1.48%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	217.02%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	-1.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SHAZ and MU is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2021	0.07

Fundamentals

Market Cap SHAZ : $691.57M MU : $1.02T
EPS SHAZ : -$3.47 MU : $44.42
PS Ratio SHAZ : 770.86 MU : 11.38
PB Ratio SHAZ : 11.10 MU : 10.25
Total Revenue (TTM) SHAZ : $1.54M MU : $90.27B
Gross Profit (TTM) SHAZ : -$1.46M MU : $65.51B
EBITDA (TTM) SHAZ : -$40.42M MU : $44.96B

Return for Risk

SHAZ vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHAZ

SHAZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHAZ vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SHAZ	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	44.79	8.65	+36.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	35.82	5.22	+30.61
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.60	1.66	+5.94
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1,736.54	21.81	+1,714.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4,209.10	78.44	+4,130.66

SHAZ vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHAZ Sharpe Ratio is 44.79, which is higher than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 8.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHAZ and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SHAZ vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHAZ drawdown since its inception was -99.78%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHAZ and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	SHAZ	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.78%	-98.25%	-1.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.73%	-30.28%	-14.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-99.78%	-57.63%	-42.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-57.63%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-23.81%	-25.47%	+1.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	-58.06%	+22.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.75%	8.54%	+9.21%

Volatility

SHAZ vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) has a higher volatility of 37.99% compared to Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) at 33.05%. This indicates that SHAZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SHAZ	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.99%	33.05%	+4.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	294.14%	62.88%	+231.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1,734.37%	76.28%	+1,658.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1,799.63%	54.96%	+1,744.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1,799.63%	50.75%	+1,748.88%

Dividends

SHAZ vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

SHAZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.06%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SHAZ and MU in my portfolio?

SHAZ and MU have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SHAZ or MU?

SHAZ has higher volatility (37.99%) compared to MU (33.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHAZ dropped -99.78% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (44.79 vs 8.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.