PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SH vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SH vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed VTI with an annualized return of -12.89%, while VTI has yielded a comparatively higher 15.05% annualized return.


SH

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-8.00%
6M
-7.59%
1Y
-17.23%
3Y*
-13.02%
5Y*
-9.07%
10Y*
-12.89%

VTI

1D
-0.72%
1M
4.99%
YTD
11.20%
6M
11.09%
1Y
28.18%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SH vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
-8.00%-11.35%-13.52%-14.80%18.98%-24.21%-25.09%-22.12%4.93%-17.36%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
11.20%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%21.21%

Correlation

The correlation between SH and VTI is -0.99, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

-0.99

The correlation between SH and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.99 to -0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

SH vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SH
VTI

Financial Services

91.6%
12.0%

Basic Materials

-

2.0%

Communication Services

-

10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.7%

Energy

-

3.7%

Healthcare

-

9.2%

Industrials

-

9.8%

Real Estate

-

2.4%

Technology

-

33.5%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

SH
91.6%
VTI
12.0%

Basic Materials

SH

-

VTI
2.0%

Communication Services

SH

-

VTI
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SH

-

VTI
10.0%

Consumer Defensive

SH

-

VTI
4.7%

Energy

SH

-

VTI
3.7%

Healthcare

SH

-

VTI
9.2%

Industrials

SH

-

VTI
9.8%

Real Estate

SH

-

VTI
2.4%

Technology

SH

-

VTI
33.5%

Utilities

SH

-

VTI
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SH vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SH
SH Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SH vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHVTIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.42

-0.65

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

3.17

-4.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.75

14.62

-16.37

SH vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SH Sharpe Ratio is -1.47, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SH and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.47

2.33

-3.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

0.73

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.72

0.82

-1.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

0.51

-1.10

Drawdowns

SH vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, which is greater than VTI's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.66%

-55.45%

-39.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.28%

-8.92%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-19.30%

-19.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.53%

-25.36%

-19.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.12%

-35.00%

-41.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.62%

-0.72%

-93.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.73%

-8.03%

-59.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.89%

1.93%

+7.96%

Volatility

SH vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have volatilities of 2.84% and 2.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.96%

-0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

9.13%

-0.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

12.17%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

17.40%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

18.30%

-0.29%

SH vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

SH vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
4.51%4.49%6.20%5.37%1.08%0.00%0.16%1.76%1.01%0.06%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


SH and VTI have a correlation of -0.99, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTI has higher volatility (2.96%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 10-year performance, VTI leads with 15.05% vs -12.89% for SH. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTI has performed better with a 15.05% return vs -12.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for SH.

SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

SH is categorized as Inverse Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. SH tracks S&P 500 (-100%), while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SH and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer