SH vs. SPTM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM).

SH and SPTM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SH is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 (-100%). It was launched on Jun 19, 2006. SPTM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Composite 1500 Index. It was launched on Oct 4, 2000. Both SH and SPTM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SH vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SH vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.94%	-11.35%	-13.52%	-14.80%	18.98%	-24.21%	-25.09%	-22.12%	4.93%	-17.36%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	-3.15%	16.93%	23.87%	25.55%	-17.75%	28.58%	17.94%	31.34%	-5.30%	21.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly higher than SPTM's -3.15% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has underperformed SPTM with an annualized return of -11.91%, while SPTM has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.

SH

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 4.70%
• YTD: 4.94%
• 6M: 4.06%
• 1Y: -11.88%
• 3Y*: -10.10%
• 5Y*: -7.71%
• 10Y*: -11.91%

SPTM

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -4.38%
• YTD: -3.15%
• 6M: -0.99%
• 1Y: 18.19%
• 3Y*: 18.05%
• 5Y*: 11.45%
• 10Y*: 13.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SH vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.

SH

ProShares Short S&P500

SPTM

SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF

Return for Risk

SH vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 4
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 2
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 8

SPTM

SPTM Risk / Return Rank: 59
SPTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
SPTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
SPTM Omega Ratio Rank: 60
SPTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
SPTM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SH vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SH	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.66	1.00	-1.65
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.82	1.52	-2.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.23	-0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	1.52	-1.98
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.56	7.28	-7.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SH vs. SPTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SH Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the SPTM Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SH and SPTM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SH	SPTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.66	1.00	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	0.68	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.66	0.77	-1.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.56	0.43	-0.99

Correlation

The correlation between SH and SPTM is -0.94. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

SH vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison

SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.95%, more than SPTM's 1.19% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SH ProShares Short S&P500	3.95%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF	1.19%	1.13%	1.28%	1.44%	1.69%	1.25%	1.56%	1.72%	1.90%	1.66%	1.91%	1.92%

Drawdowns

SH vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.26%, which is greater than SPTM's maximum drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and SPTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SH	SPTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.26%	-54.80%	-39.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.61%	-12.21%	-14.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.35%	-24.14%	-16.21%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-74.31%	-34.66%	-39.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.87%	-5.36%	-88.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.50%	-9.10%	-58.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.86%	2.55%	+19.31%

Volatility

SH vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) have volatilities of 5.36% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SH	SPTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	5.35%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.45%	9.54%	-0.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.18%	18.33%	-0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.86%	16.87%	-0.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.99%	18.03%	-0.04%