SH vs. HDGE
SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SH is passively managed, while HDGE is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.89%/yr vs -14.77%/yr for HDGE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SH charges 0.90%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.
Performance
SH vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has outperformed HDGE with an annualized return of -12.89%, while HDGE has yielded a comparatively lower -14.77% annualized return.
SH
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -4.35%
- YTD
- -8.00%
- 6M
- -7.59%
- 1Y
- -17.23%
- 3Y*
- -13.02%
- 5Y*
- -9.07%
- 10Y*
- -12.89%
HDGE
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 5.43%
- 6M
- 5.59%
- 1Y
- -0.65%
- 3Y*
- -5.06%
- 5Y*
- -2.89%
- 10Y*
- -14.77%
SH vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | -8.00% | -11.35% | -13.52% | -14.80% | 18.98% | -24.21% | -25.09% | -22.12% | 4.93% | -17.36% |
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 5.43% | 1.50% | -8.01% | -26.98% | 16.59% | -18.61% | -43.47% | -36.27% | 7.53% | -15.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SH and HDGE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011 | 0.77 |
The correlation between SH and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SH vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SH
HDGE
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
SH
HDGE
Basic Materials
SH
-
HDGE
Communication Services
SH
-
HDGE
Consumer Cyclical
SH
-
HDGE
Consumer Defensive
SH
-
HDGE
Energy
SH
-
HDGE
Healthcare
SH
-
HDGE
Industrials
SH
-
HDGE
Real Estate
SH
-
HDGE
Technology
SH
-
HDGE
Utilities
SH
-
HDGE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SH vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank
SH
HDGE
SH vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SH | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.01 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.95 | -0.05 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.75 | -0.11 | -1.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SH | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.47 | -0.04 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.54 | -0.12 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.72 | -0.63 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.67 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SH vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and HDGE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SH | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.66% | -93.88% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.28% | -12.26% | -6.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -38.82% | -29.46% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.53% | -42.97% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.12% | -83.69% | +7.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.62% | -93.08% | -1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.73% | -70.11% | +2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.89% | 6.16% | +3.73% |
Volatility
SH vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 2.84%, while AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SH | HDGE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 6.41% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.91% | 12.81% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.80% | 18.33% | -6.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.85% | 24.18% | -7.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.01% | 23.56% | -5.55% |
SH vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SH vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison
SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than HDGE's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF | 3.32% | 3.50% | 7.83% | 9.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SH ProShares Short S&P500 | 4.51% | 4.49% | 6.20% | 5.37% | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 1.76% | 1.01% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SH and HDGE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs HDGE's -93.88%.
On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.89% vs -14.77% for HDGE. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.89% return vs -14.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.
SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.32% for HDGE.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 3.36% for HDGE.
HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SH and HDGE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer