PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SH vs. HDGE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SH vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -8.00% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 5.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has outperformed HDGE with an annualized return of -12.89%, while HDGE has yielded a comparatively lower -14.77% annualized return.


SH

1D
0.70%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-8.00%
6M
-7.59%
1Y
-17.23%
3Y*
-13.02%
5Y*
-9.07%
10Y*
-12.89%

HDGE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.09%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.59%
1Y
-0.65%
3Y*
-5.06%
5Y*
-2.89%
10Y*
-14.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SH vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
-8.00%-11.35%-13.52%-14.80%18.98%-24.21%-25.09%-22.12%4.93%-17.36%
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
5.43%1.50%-8.01%-26.98%16.59%-18.61%-43.47%-36.27%7.53%-15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SH and HDGE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2011

0.77

The correlation between SH and HDGE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SH vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SH
HDGE

Financial Services

91.6%
-23.5%

Basic Materials

-

-1.3%

Communication Services

-

-3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

-4.9%

Energy

-

-2.5%

Healthcare

-

-3.5%

Industrials

-

-14.1%

Real Estate

-

-9.0%

Technology

-

-26.1%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

SH
91.6%
HDGE
-23.5%

Basic Materials

SH

-

HDGE
-1.3%

Communication Services

SH

-

HDGE
-3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SH

-

HDGE
-18.6%

Consumer Defensive

SH

-

HDGE
-4.9%

Energy

SH

-

HDGE
-2.5%

Healthcare

SH

-

HDGE
-3.5%

Industrials

SH

-

HDGE
-14.1%

Real Estate

SH

-

HDGE
-9.0%

Technology

SH

-

HDGE
-26.1%

Utilities

SH

-

HDGE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SH vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SH
SH Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

HDGE
HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SH vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHHDGEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.01

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.95

-0.05

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.75

-0.11

-1.64

SH vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SH Sharpe Ratio is -1.47, which is lower than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of -0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SH and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHHDGEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.47

-0.04

-1.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.54

-0.12

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.72

-0.63

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.59

-0.67

+0.08

Drawdowns

SH vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and HDGE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHHDGEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.66%

-93.88%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.28%

-12.26%

-6.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-38.82%

-29.46%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.53%

-42.97%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.12%

-83.69%

+7.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.62%

-93.08%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-67.73%

-70.11%

+2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.89%

6.16%

+3.73%

Volatility

SH vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 2.84%, while AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHHDGEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

6.41%

-3.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

12.81%

-3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.80%

18.33%

-6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.85%

24.18%

-7.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

23.56%

-5.55%

SH vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SH has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

SH vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than HDGE's 3.32% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
HDGE
AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF
3.32%3.50%7.83%9.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.22%0.00%0.00%
SH
ProShares Short S&P500
4.51%4.49%6.20%5.37%1.08%0.00%0.16%1.76%1.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


SH and HDGE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HDGE has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to SH (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.89% vs -14.77% for HDGE. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.89% return vs -14.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SH is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.51%, compared with 3.32% for HDGE.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for SH and 3.36% for HDGE.

HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SH and HDGE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer