SH vs. HDGE

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

SH (ProShares Short S&P500) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. SH is passively managed, while HDGE is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SH returned -12.90%/yr vs -15.19%/yr for HDGE. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SH charges 0.89%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.

Performance

SH vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SH achieves a -5.55% return, which is significantly lower than HDGE's 6.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SH has outperformed HDGE with an annualized return of -12.90%, while HDGE has yielded a comparatively lower -15.19% annualized return.

SH

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 1.68%
• YTD: -5.55%
• 6M: -4.58%
• 1Y: -14.55%
• 3Y*: -11.90%
• 5Y*: -8.40%
• 10Y*: -12.90%

HDGE

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.12%
• YTD: 6.12%
• 6M: 6.85%
• 1Y: 2.56%
• 3Y*: -4.06%
• 5Y*: -1.94%
• 10Y*: -15.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SH vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SH ProShares Short S&P500	-5.55%	-11.35%	-13.52%	-14.80%	18.98%	-24.21%	-25.09%	-22.12%	4.93%	-17.36%
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	6.12%	1.50%	-8.01%	-26.98%	16.59%	-18.61%	-43.47%	-36.27%	7.53%	-15.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SH and HDGE is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011	0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between SH and HDGE has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SH vs. HDGE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SH	HDGE
Financial Services	83.0%	-25.3%
Basic Materials	-	-1.3%
Communication Services	-	-6.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	-18.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	-3.0%
Energy	-	-2.5%
Healthcare	-	-1.2%
Industrials	-	-13.9%
Real Estate	-	-8.6%
Technology	-	-19.5%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SH vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SH

SH Risk / Return Rank: 1
SH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
SH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
SH Omega Ratio Rank: 1
SH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
SH Martin Ratio Rank: 1

HDGE

HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 10
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SH vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SH	HDGE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.17	0.14	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.68	0.33	-2.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.04	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	0.21	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.67	0.43	-2.11

SH vs. HDGE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SH Sharpe Ratio is -1.17, which is lower than the HDGE Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SH and HDGE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SH vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SH drawdown since its inception was -94.66%, roughly equal to the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SH and HDGE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SH	HDGE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.66%	-93.88%	-0.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.42%	-12.26%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-38.82%	-29.46%	-9.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.53%	-42.97%	-1.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.12%	-83.69%	+7.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-94.48%	-93.03%	-1.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.78%	-70.17%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.62%	5.97%	+3.65%

Volatility

SH vs. HDGE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Short S&P500 (SH) is 4.80%, while AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE) has a volatility of 5.85%. This indicates that SH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HDGE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SH	HDGE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	5.85%	-1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.83%	12.98%	-3.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.46%	18.33%	-5.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.95%	24.19%	-7.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.03%	23.50%	-5.47%

SH vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SH has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

SH vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

SH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than HDGE's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	3.29%	3.50%	7.83%	9.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%
SH ProShares Short S&P500	4.39%	4.49%	6.20%	5.37%	1.08%	0.00%	0.16%	1.76%	1.01%	0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SH and HDGE in my portfolio?

SH and HDGE have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SH or HDGE?

HDGE has higher volatility (5.85%) compared to SH (4.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SH dropped -94.66% vs HDGE's -93.88%.

Which ETF is better, SH or HDGE?

On 10-year performance, SH leads with -12.90% vs -15.19% for HDGE. On fees, SH is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, SH has been the lower-risk option at 4.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SH or HDGE?

Over the 10-year period, SH has performed better with a -12.90% return vs -15.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SH or HDGE?

SH is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SH or HDGE?

SH has the higher dividend yield at 4.39%, compared with 3.29% for HDGE.

What is the main difference between SH and HDGE?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for SH and 3.36% for HDGE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HDGE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.