SGVT vs. SCHH
SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and SCHH (Schwab US REIT ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab, while SCHH is a REIT fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index. SGVT is actively managed, while SCHH is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for SCHH.
Performance
SGVT vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 11.08% return.
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 11.08%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 4.02%
SGVT vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 11.08% | -0.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGVT and SCHH is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGVT vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank
SGVT
SCHH
SGVT vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGVT | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.92 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 18.57 | 0.34 | +18.23 |
Drawdowns
SGVT vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum SCHH drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and SCHH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGVT | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -44.22% | +44.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.19% | +3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.00% | -9.45% | +9.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.62% | — |
Volatility
SGVT vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGVT | SCHH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 13.17% | -12.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 18.70% | -18.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.20% | 20.97% | -20.77% |
SGVT vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGVT vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison
SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than SCHH's 2.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHH Schwab US REIT ETF | 2.82% | 3.04% | 3.22% | 3.24% | 2.55% | 1.50% | 2.86% | 2.86% | 3.64% | 2.22% | 2.81% | 2.48% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGVT and SCHH have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHH is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHH is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for SGVT.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 2.82% for SCHH.
SGVT is categorized as Money Market, while SCHH is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.07% for SCHH.
Find the right allocation for SGVT and SCHH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer