SGVT vs. LSAT

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) and LSAT (Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF) are both Money Market funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SGVT returned 3.72% vs 11.97% for LSAT. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGVT charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for LSAT.

Performance

SGVT vs. LSAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGVT achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than LSAT's 11.67% return.

SGVT

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.72%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LSAT

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 1.22%
• YTD: 11.67%
• 6M: 10.00%
• 1Y: 11.97%
• 3Y*: 12.49%
• 5Y*: 6.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGVT vs. LSAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	1.60%	2.22%
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	11.67%	0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SGVT and LSAT is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025	0.04

Return for Risk

SGVT vs. LSAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGVT

SGVT Risk / Return Rank: 100
SGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

LSAT

LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 29
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 25
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGVT vs. LSAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) and Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGVT	LSAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	17.28	0.93	+16.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	82.83	1.44	+81.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	29.17	1.16	+28.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	137.94	1.51	+136.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1,101.11	3.55	+1,097.56

SGVT vs. LSAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGVT Sharpe Ratio is 17.28, which is higher than the LSAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGVT and LSAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SGVT vs. LSAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGVT drawdown since its inception was -0.03%, smaller than the maximum LSAT drawdown of -20.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGVT and LSAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGVT	LSAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-20.48%	+20.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.03%	-7.94%	+7.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.25%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.48%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.00%	-0.28%	+0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-5.51%	+5.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.00%	3.38%	-3.38%

Volatility

SGVT vs. LSAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT) is 0.09%, while Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a volatility of 3.48%. This indicates that SGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGVT	LSAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.09%	3.48%	-3.39%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.15%	9.42%	-9.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22%	12.93%	-12.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.22%	16.25%	-16.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.22%	16.74%	-16.52%

SGVT vs. LSAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGVT has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than LSAT's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGVT vs. LSAT - Dividend Comparison

SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than LSAT's 1.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.70%	1.90%	1.31%	1.85%	0.36%	3.44%	0.30%
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF	3.11%	1.73%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGVT and LSAT in my portfolio?

SGVT and LSAT have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGVT or LSAT?

LSAT has higher volatility (3.48%) compared to SGVT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGVT dropped -0.03% vs LSAT's -20.48%.

Which ETF is better, SGVT or LSAT?

On 1-year performance, LSAT leads with 11.97% vs 3.72% for SGVT. On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, SGVT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SGVT or LSAT?

Over the 1-year period, LSAT has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 3.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGVT or LSAT?

SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for LSAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGVT or LSAT?

SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 1.70% for LSAT.

What is the main difference between SGVT and LSAT?

They also come from different issuers: Charles Schwab and Redwood. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for SGVT and 0.99% for LSAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.28 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.