PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGRT vs. CHPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGRT vs. CHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 48.90% return, which is significantly lower than CHPX's 94.06% return.


SGRT

1D
-1.69%
1M
9.59%
YTD
48.90%
6M
51.74%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPX

1D
-2.82%
1M
25.89%
YTD
94.06%
6M
90.64%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGRT vs. CHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SGRT and CHPX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.82

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGRT vs. CHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth 30 ETF (SGRT) and Global X AI Semiconductor & Quantum ETF (CHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SGRT vs. CHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGRTCHPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.63

5.00

-1.37

Drawdowns

SGRT vs. CHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, which is greater than CHPX's maximum drawdown of -15.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and CHPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGRTCHPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-15.15%

-2.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-2.84%

+1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.10%

-3.77%

+0.67%

Volatility

SGRT vs. CHPX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGRTCHPXDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.40%

38.38%

-4.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.40%

38.38%

-4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.40%

38.38%

-4.98%

SGRT vs. CHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than CHPX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGRT vs. CHPX - Dividend Comparison

SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, more than CHPX's 0.03% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SGRT and CHPX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHPX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHPX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.

SGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.03% for CHPX.

SGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CHPX is Semiconductors. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.50% for CHPX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGRT and CHPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer