SGRT vs. BBUS
SGRT (SMART Earnings Growth ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGRT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. SGRT is actively managed, while BBUS is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGRT charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
SGRT vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGRT achieves a 34.03% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 10.07% return.
SGRT
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -7.07%
- 6M
- 27.60%
- YTD
- 34.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- 6M
- 7.98%
- YTD
- 10.07%
- 1Y
- 20.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.52%
- 10Y*
- —
SGRT vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 34.03% | 26.83% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.07% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGRT and BBUS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGRT vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
SGRT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BBUS
SGRT vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Earnings Growth ETF (SGRT) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGRT | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGRT vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGRT drawdown since its inception was -17.87%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRT and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGRT | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -35.35% | +17.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.78% | -1.22% | -11.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -5.41% | +1.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.13% | — |
Volatility
SGRT vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGRT | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.10% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.02% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.74% | 12.60% | +24.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 17.15% | +19.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.74% | 19.54% | +17.20% |
SGRT vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGRT has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGRT vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
SGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
SGRT SMART Earnings Growth ETF | 0.12% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGRT and BBUS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SGRT.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.12% for SGRT.
SGRT is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SGRT and 0.02% for BBUS.
Find the right allocation for SGRT and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer