SGRNX vs. EKBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX).
SGRNX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 24, 2000. EKBAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 19, 1998.
Performance
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRNX Allspring Growth Fund | -9.51% | 15.34% | 29.43% | 34.06% | -36.92% | 7.43% | 49.20% | 37.61% | 0.69% | 35.24% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 7.46% | 21.87% | 21.75% | 22.23% | -13.47% | 19.61% | 12.66% | 32.99% | -5.55% | 14.43% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGRNX achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 7.46% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGRNX having a 13.61% annualized return and EKBAX not far ahead at 14.11%.
SGRNX
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
EKBAX
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- -4.52%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 13.50%
- 1Y
- 39.99%
- 3Y*
- 22.93%
- 5Y*
- 14.35%
- 10Y*
- 14.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGRNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGRNX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank
SGRNX
EKBAX
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGRNX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 1.96 | -1.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.56 | -1.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.41 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 3.08 | -2.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 15.01 | -12.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGRNX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.96 | -1.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.81 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.81 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGRNX and EKBAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison
SGRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.41%, more than EKBAX's 8.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRNX Allspring Growth Fund | 23.41% | 21.19% | 21.72% | 7.14% | 4.93% | 16.48% | 10.02% | 9.81% | 19.24% | 27.01% | 18.95% | 13.11% |
EKBAX Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund | 8.95% | 9.61% | 5.28% | 6.16% | 12.50% | 6.89% | 2.03% | 9.49% | 7.14% | 6.20% | 10.05% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGRNX drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRNX and EKBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGRNX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.68% | -55.64% | +2.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.99% | -13.29% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.79% | -24.84% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -32.33% | -17.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.25% | -4.75% | -10.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -8.03% | -7.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.86% | 2.72% | +3.14% |
Volatility
SGRNX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) has a higher volatility of 8.60% compared to Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) at 6.47%. This indicates that SGRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGRNX | EKBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.60% | 6.47% | +2.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 13.05% | +1.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.26% | 20.88% | +3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 17.89% | +8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 17.42% | +7.00% |