SGRNX vs. TBCIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX).
SGRNX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Feb 24, 2000. TBCIX is managed by T. Rowe Price.
Performance
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRNX Allspring Growth Fund | -9.51% | 15.34% | 29.43% | 34.06% | -36.92% | 7.43% | 49.20% | 37.61% | 0.69% | 35.24% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | -11.20% | 18.94% | 48.73% | 49.61% | -38.48% | 18.30% | 34.90% | 30.30% | 2.13% | 36.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGRNX achieves a -9.51% return, which is significantly higher than TBCIX's -11.20% return. Over the past 10 years, SGRNX has underperformed TBCIX with an annualized return of 13.61%, while TBCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.
SGRNX
- 1D
- 4.61%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -9.51%
- 6M
- -12.99%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 16.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
TBCIX
- 1D
- 3.90%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- YTD
- -11.20%
- 6M
- -9.94%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 26.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.79%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGRNX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TBCIX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGRNX vs. TBCIX — Risk / Return Rank
SGRNX
TBCIX
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) and T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGRNX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 1.21 | -0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 0.78 | +0.07 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | 2.71 | +0.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGRNX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 0.72 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.45 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.71 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.68 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGRNX and TBCIX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Dividend Comparison
SGRNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.41%, more than TBCIX's 5.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGRNX Allspring Growth Fund | 23.41% | 21.19% | 21.72% | 7.14% | 4.93% | 16.48% | 10.02% | 9.81% | 19.24% | 27.01% | 18.95% | 13.11% |
TBCIX T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class | 5.86% | 5.20% | 18.28% | 3.47% | 5.84% | 10.03% | 1.18% | 0.59% | 2.50% | 3.05% | 0.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGRNX drawdown since its inception was -52.68%, which is greater than TBCIX's maximum drawdown of -43.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGRNX and TBCIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGRNX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.68% | -43.26% | -9.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.99% | -16.96% | -2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.79% | -43.26% | -6.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.79% | -43.26% | -6.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.25% | -13.72% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.71% | -8.15% | -7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.86% | 4.86% | +1.00% |
Volatility
SGRNX vs. TBCIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Growth Fund (SGRNX) has a higher volatility of 8.60% compared to T. Rowe Price Blue Chip Growth Fund I Class (TBCIX) at 7.01%. This indicates that SGRNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TBCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGRNX | TBCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.60% | 7.01% | +1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.58% | 12.40% | +2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.26% | 22.77% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.94% | 23.94% | +2.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.42% | 22.73% | +1.69% |