SGOL vs. PPLT
SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) and PPLT (abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGOL is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while PPLT is a Precious Metals fund tracking the LBMA Platinum Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGOL returned 11.49%/yr vs 4.41%/yr for PPLT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGOL charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PPLT.
Performance
SGOL vs. PPLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGOL achieves a -6.67% return, which is significantly higher than PPLT's -22.28% return. Over the past 10 years, SGOL has outperformed PPLT with an annualized return of 11.49%, while PPLT has yielded a comparatively lower 4.41% annualized return.
SGOL
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -10.69%
- YTD
- -6.67%
- 6M
- -10.17%
- 1Y
- 20.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.73%
- 5Y*
- 17.55%
- 10Y*
- 11.49%
PPLT
- 1D
- 1.83%
- 1M
- -18.32%
- YTD
- -22.28%
- 6M
- -29.15%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.98%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
SGOL vs. PPLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF | -6.67% | 63.99% | 26.90% | 12.99% | -0.51% | -3.94% | 25.03% | 18.21% | -1.94% | 12.86% |
PPLT abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF | -22.28% | 124.48% | -8.90% | -8.18% | 10.43% | -10.75% | 10.78% | 20.85% | -14.95% | 2.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGOL and PPLT is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2010 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SGOL and PPLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (10 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGOL vs. PPLT — Risk / Return Rank
SGOL
PPLT
SGOL vs. PPLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) and abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGOL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.10 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 0.39 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | 0.90 | +1.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGOL vs. PPLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGOL drawdown since its inception was -45.51%, smaller than the maximum PPLT drawdown of -70.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGOL and PPLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGOL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.51% | -70.73% | +25.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.16% | -43.59% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.16% | -43.59% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.16% | -43.59% | +17.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -26.16% | -51.14% | +24.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.42% | -42.56% | +17.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.42% | -39.94% | +21.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.34% | 18.74% | -9.40% |
Volatility
SGOL vs. PPLT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) is 8.65%, while abrdn Physical Platinum Shares ETF (PPLT) has a volatility of 12.16%. This indicates that SGOL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGOL | PPLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.65% | 12.16% | -3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.24% | 45.01% | -20.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.43% | 50.91% | -23.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.18% | 32.76% | -14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 29.21% | -13.18% |
SGOL vs. PPLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGOL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than PPLT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGOL vs. PPLT - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGOL nor PPLT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGOL and PPLT have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPLT has higher volatility (12.16%) compared to SGOL (8.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGOL dropped -45.51% vs PPLT's -70.73%.
On 10-year performance, SGOL leads with 11.49% vs 4.41% for PPLT. On fees, SGOL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, SGOL has been the lower-risk option at 8.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGOL has performed better with a 11.49% return vs 4.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SGOL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PPLT.
SGOL and PPLT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SGOL is categorized as Gold, while PPLT is Precious Metals. SGOL tracks LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt), while PPLT tracks LBMA Platinum Price PM. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for SGOL and 0.60% for PPLT.
SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGOL and PPLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer