PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGMT vs. NBIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SGMT vs. NBIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGMT achieves a 9.46% return, which is significantly lower than NBIS's 177.59% return.


SGMT

1D
0.78%
1M
-14.74%
YTD
9.46%
6M
4.01%
1Y
-24.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NBIS

1D
4.55%
1M
12.10%
YTD
177.59%
6M
164.98%
1Y
362.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGMT vs. NBIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SGMT
Sagimet Biosciences Inc.
9.46%31.56%-16.67%
NBIS
Nebius Group N.V.
177.59%202.18%46.25%

Correlation

The correlation between SGMT and NBIS is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2024

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SGMT:

$210.99M

NBIS:

$71.79B

EPS

SGMT:

-$1.34

NBIS:

$3.17

PB Ratio

SGMT:

2.06

NBIS:

9.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

SGMT:

$0.00

NBIS:

$877.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SGMT:

$0.00

NBIS:

$420.60M

EBITDA (TTM)

SGMT:

-$48.74M

NBIS:

-$52.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGMT vs. NBIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGMT
SGMT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
SGMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGMT Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SGMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGMT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

NBIS
NBIS Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NBIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NBIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NBIS Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
NBIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NBIS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGMT vs. NBIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) and Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGMTNBISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.02

1.42

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.45

8.03

-8.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

18.34

-19.07

SGMT vs. NBIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the NBIS Sharpe Ratio of 3.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGMT and NBIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGMT vs. NBIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGMT drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, which is greater than NBIS's maximum drawdown of -58.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGMT and NBIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGMTNBISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.69%

-58.27%

-31.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.57%

-45.47%

-10.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.82%

-12.15%

-52.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.85%

-18.94%

-46.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.91%

19.86%

+14.05%

Volatility

SGMT vs. NBIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) is 13.28%, while Nebius Group N.V. (NBIS) has a volatility of 30.23%. This indicates that SGMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NBIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGMTNBISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.28%

30.23%

-16.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.70%

71.43%

-11.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

100.42%

104.41%

-3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

150.96%

110.20%

+40.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

150.96%

110.20%

+40.76%

Dividends

SGMT vs. NBIS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGMT nor NBIS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

SGMT vs. NBIS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sagimet Biosciences Inc. and Nebius Group N.V.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober20260
399.00M
(SGMT) Total Revenue
(NBIS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SGMT and NBIS have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NBIS has higher volatility (30.23%) compared to SGMT (13.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGMT dropped -89.69% vs NBIS's -58.27%.

NBIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGMT and NBIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer