SGMT vs. CCJ
SGMT (Sagimet Biosciences Inc.) and CCJ (Cameco Corporation) are both stocks. SGMT operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while CCJ operates in Uranium (Energy). Over the past 3 years, SGMT returned -23.71%/yr vs 36.00%/yr for CCJ. Their 0.16 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SGMT vs. CCJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGMT achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly higher than CCJ's -5.59% return.
SGMT
- 1D
- -2.74%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- 6M
- 25.40%
- YTD
- 20.10%
- 1Y
- -13.82%
- 3Y*
- -23.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.57%
CCJ
- 1D
- -2.10%
- 1M
- -10.52%
- 6M
- -29.99%
- YTD
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- 18.67%
- 3Y*
- 36.00%
- 5Y*
- 37.49%
- 10Y*
- 25.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $353.80M | $350.26M | $354.16M | |
| $4.58M | $6.47M | $7.56M |
SGMT vs. CCJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SGMT Sagimet Biosciences Inc. | 20.10% | 31.56% | -16.97% | -65.03% |
CCJ Cameco Corporation | -5.59% | 78.38% | 19.47% | 33.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGMT and CCJ is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2023 | 0.16 |
Fundamentals
SGMT:
$231.66M
CCJ:
$37.62B
SGMT:
-$1.34
CCJ:
CA$1.49
SGMT:
2.26
CCJ:
7.44
SGMT:
$0.00
CCJ:
CA$3.54B
SGMT:
$0.00
CCJ:
CA$1.04B
SGMT:
-$48.74M
CCJ:
CA$996.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGMT vs. CCJ — Risk / Return Rank
SGMT
CCJ
SGMT vs. CCJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) and Cameco Corporation (CCJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGMT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.10 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.35 | 0.42 | -0.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.58 | 0.98 | -1.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGMT vs. CCJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGMT drawdown since its inception was -89.69%, roughly equal to the maximum CCJ drawdown of -87.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGMT and CCJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGMT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.69% | -87.53% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.51% | -36.93% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.69% | -40.01% | -49.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -40.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.40% | -35.58% | -25.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.63% | -46.00% | -19.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.21% | 15.91% | +15.30% |
Volatility
SGMT vs. CCJ - Volatility Comparison
Sagimet Biosciences Inc. (SGMT) has a higher volatility of 16.92% compared to Cameco Corporation (CCJ) at 11.91%. This indicates that SGMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGMT | CCJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.92% | 11.91% | +5.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.03% | 39.28% | +20.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.80% | 55.93% | +29.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.18% | 49.93% | +98.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.18% | 46.76% | +101.42% |
Dividends
SGMT vs. CCJ - Dividend Comparison
SGMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CCJ Cameco Corporation | 0.20% | 0.19% | 0.22% | 0.20% | 0.39% | 0.29% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.53% | 4.33% | 3.82% | 3.24% |
SGMT Sagimet Biosciences Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SGMT vs. CCJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sagimet Biosciences Inc. and Cameco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
SGMT and CCJ have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGMT has higher volatility (16.92%) compared to CCJ (11.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGMT dropped -89.69% vs CCJ's -87.53%.
CCJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGMT and CCJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer