SGML vs. UAMY

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY).

Performance

SGML vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SGML vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SGML Sigma Lithium Resources Corp	-55.42%	17.56%	-64.41%	11.73%	171.09%	28.52%
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	65.34%	183.62%	610.84%	-48.86%	-2.19%	-45.07%

Fundamentals

Market Cap SGML : $654.49M UAMY : $1.03B
EPS SGML : -$0.34 UAMY : -$0.03
PS Ratio SGML : 4.08 UAMY : 26.38
PB Ratio SGML : 7.81 UAMY : 7.28
Total Revenue (TTM) SGML : $160.32M UAMY : $39.26M
Gross Profit (TTM) SGML : $27.15M UAMY : $9.87M
EBITDA (TTM) SGML : -$15.83M UAMY : -$6.89M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGML achieves a -55.42% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 65.34% return.

SGML

• 1D: -52.35%
• 1M: -58.06%
• YTD: -55.42%
• 6M: -13.91%
• 1Y: -42.10%
• 3Y*: -46.13%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UAMY

• 1D: -4.93%
• 1M: -22.07%
• YTD: 65.34%
• 6M: 9.93%
• 1Y: 268.89%
• 3Y*: 180.17%
• 5Y*: 47.47%
• 10Y*: 42.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SGML vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGML

SGML Risk / Return Rank: 46
SGML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
SGML Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SGML Omega Ratio Rank: 82
SGML Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
SGML Martin Ratio Rank: 17

UAMY

UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 86
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGML vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.15	2.06	-2.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.71	-0.65
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.31	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.67	3.73	-4.41
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.23	6.95	-8.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGML vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGML Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGML and UAMY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.15	2.06	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.43	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.05	0.07	-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between SGML and UAMY is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SGML vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGML nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SGML vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGML drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGML and UAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.91%	-96.44%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.56%	-74.30%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-84.49%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-86.13%	-52.49%	-33.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.46%	-66.57%	+24.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	35.22%	39.90%	-4.68%

Volatility

SGML vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) has a higher volatility of 80.16% compared to United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) at 39.33%. This indicates that SGML's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	80.16%	39.33%	+40.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	249.27%	107.41%	+141.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	288.13%	131.56%	+156.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	146.90%	93.61%	+53.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	146.90%	100.36%	+46.54%

Financials

SGML vs. UAMY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sigma Lithium Resources Corp and United States Antimony Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

SGML - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a gross profit of -1.53M and revenue of 28.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -5.4%.

UAMY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United States Antimony Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.65M and revenue of 13.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.3%.

SGML - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported an operating income of -9.07M and revenue of 28.55M, resulting in an operating margin of -31.8%.

UAMY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United States Antimony Corporation reported an operating income of -3.92M and revenue of 13.03M, resulting in an operating margin of -30.1%.

SGML - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sigma Lithium Resources Corp reported a net income of -11.58M and revenue of 28.55M, resulting in a net margin of -40.5%.

UAMY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, United States Antimony Corporation reported a net income of -286.91K and revenue of 13.03M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.