SGML vs. UAMY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SGML (Sigma Lithium Resources Corp) and UAMY (United States Antimony Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 3 years, SGML returned -27.49%/yr vs 203.89%/yr for UAMY. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

SGML vs. UAMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGML achieves a 14.94% return, which is significantly lower than UAMY's 82.47% return.

SGML

• 1D: -8.01%
• 1M: -32.83%
• YTD: 14.94%
• 6M: 51.15%
• 1Y: 202.59%
• 3Y*: -27.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UAMY

• 1D: -10.11%
• 1M: -22.04%
• YTD: 82.47%
• 6M: 72.18%
• 1Y: 244.36%
• 3Y*: 203.89%
• 5Y*: 57.05%
• 10Y*: 45.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGML vs. UAMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SGML Sigma Lithium Resources Corp	14.94%	17.56%	-64.41%	11.73%	171.09%	28.52%
UAMY United States Antimony Corporation	82.47%	183.62%	610.84%	-48.86%	-2.19%	-45.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SGML and UAMY is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021	0.18

The correlation between SGML and UAMY shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap SGML : $1.69B UAMY : $1.30B
EPS SGML : -$0.39 UAMY : -$0.13
PS Ratio SGML : 16.21 UAMY : 30.26
PB Ratio SGML : 23.25 UAMY : 9.83
Total Revenue (TTM) SGML : $104.10M UAMY : $39.04M
Gross Profit (TTM) SGML : $28.12M UAMY : $4.34M
EBITDA (TTM) SGML : $5.88M UAMY : -$15.23M

Return for Risk

SGML vs. UAMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGML

SGML Risk / Return Rank: 84
SGML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
SGML Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SGML Omega Ratio Rank: 93
SGML Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
SGML Martin Ratio Rank: 87

UAMY

UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 82
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 79
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGML vs. UAMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) and United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	1.86	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.38	2.68	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.30	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.31	-0.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.77	5.78	+3.99
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGML vs. UAMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGML Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the UAMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGML and UAMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	1.86	-1.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	0.07	+0.03

Drawdowns

SGML vs. UAMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGML drawdown since its inception was -89.91%, smaller than the maximum UAMY drawdown of -96.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGML and UAMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.91%	-96.44%	+6.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-64.56%	-74.30%	+9.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-89.75%	-74.30%	-15.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-80.46%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-89.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-64.25%	-47.57%	-16.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.97%	-66.43%	+23.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.83%	42.51%	-21.68%

Volatility

SGML vs. UAMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sigma Lithium Resources Corp (SGML) is 24.63%, while United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a volatility of 32.49%. This indicates that SGML experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UAMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGML	UAMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.63%	32.49%	-7.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	221.92%	92.81%	+129.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	283.19%	132.11%	+151.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	143.56%	94.88%	+48.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	143.56%	101.04%	+42.52%

Dividends

SGML vs. UAMY - Dividend Comparison

Neither SGML nor UAMY has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGML and UAMY in my portfolio?

SGML and UAMY have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGML or UAMY?

UAMY has higher volatility (32.49%) compared to SGML (24.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGML dropped -89.91% vs UAMY's -96.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UAMY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.