SGLLV.AX vs. CLS

Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ricegrowers Limited (SGLLV.AX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS).

Performance

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in Ricegrowers Limited (SGLLV.AX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SGLLV.AX is traded in AUD, while CLS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CLS values have been converted to AUD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGLLV.AX achieves a -18.84% return, which is significantly lower than CLS's -3.61% return.

SGLLV.AX

• 1D: -1.61%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: -18.84%
• 6M: -24.86%
• 1Y: 36.64%
• 3Y*: 37.42%
• 5Y*: 23.64%
• 10Y*: —

CLS

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: 11.65%
• YTD: -3.61%
• 6M: 20.63%
• 1Y: 290.46%
• 3Y*: 184.06%
• 5Y*: 106.26%
• 10Y*: 40.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SGLLV.AX Ricegrowers Limited	-18.84%	65.21%	76.02%	8.44%	-1.16%	13.50%	62.57%	-45.58%
CLS Celestica Inc.	-3.61%	197.02%	246.95%	160.00%	7.95%	46.00%	-10.99%	-3.29%

Correlation

The correlation between SGLLV.AX and CLS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. They neither move together nor in opposition — each responds to its own set of market drivers. This independence makes them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

Return for Risk

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGLLV.AX

SGLLV.AX Risk / Return Rank: 66
SGLLV.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
SGLLV.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
SGLLV.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
SGLLV.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SGLLV.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ricegrowers Limited (SGLLV.AX) and Celestica Inc. (CLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGLLV.AX	CLS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	3.26	-2.32
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.59	3.08	-1.49
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.42	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	6.92	-5.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.04	17.80	-14.76
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGLLV.AX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is lower than the CLS Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGLLV.AX and CLS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGLLV.AX	CLS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	3.26	-2.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82	1.99	-1.17
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.53	-0.10

Drawdowns

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGLLV.AX drawdown since its inception was -55.29%, smaller than the maximum CLS drawdown of -74.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGLLV.AX and CLS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGLLV.AX	CLS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.29%	-96.93%	+41.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.33%	-29.24%	-4.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.33%	-53.96%	+20.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.23%	-16.38%	-8.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-73.78%	+59.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.07%	11.08%	+0.99%

Volatility

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ricegrowers Limited (SGLLV.AX) is 14.53%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a volatility of 21.61%. This indicates that SGLLV.AX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGLLV.AX	CLS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.53%	21.61%	-7.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.08%	53.06%	-22.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.60%	69.41%	-29.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.82%	53.78%	-24.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.64%	46.92%	-13.28%

Dividends

SGLLV.AX vs. CLS - Dividend Comparison

SGLLV.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%, while CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SGLLV.AX Ricegrowers Limited	5.19%	4.21%	5.63%	8.45%	6.12%	6.16%	5.05%	7.75%
CLS Celestica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials