PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SEACX vs. DHEAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund (DHEAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SEACX achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than DHEAX's 1.65% return.


SEACX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.09%
YTD
-0.01%
6M
0.03%
1Y
4.67%
3Y*
3.79%
5Y*
0.15%
10Y*
1.14%

DHEAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.33%
YTD
1.65%
6M
1.93%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
4.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SEACX
Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund
-0.01%6.50%1.43%5.54%-11.55%-2.01%4.97%6.96%-0.12%2.24%
DHEAX
Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund
1.65%5.70%9.15%8.38%-3.57%2.42%2.87%4.44%2.88%3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between SEACX and DHEAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.58

The correlation between SEACX and DHEAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.70 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SEACX vs. DHEAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SEACX
SEACX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SEACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
SEACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

DHEAX
DHEAX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
DHEAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHEAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHEAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
DHEAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHEAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund (DHEAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SEACXDHEAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

4.52

-3.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.77

7.62

-5.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

2.47

-1.26

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

10.22

-8.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

44.82

-39.73

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SEACX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the DHEAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SEACX and DHEAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SEACXDHEAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

4.52

-3.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

2.80

-2.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

1.76

-1.09

Drawdowns

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SEACX drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, which is greater than DHEAX's maximum drawdown of -12.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEACX and DHEAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SEACXDHEAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.96%

-12.34%

-4.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.66%

-0.50%

-2.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.90%

-0.50%

-3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-5.06%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.51%

0.00%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-0.80%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

0.11%

+0.80%

Volatility

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund (DHEAX) at 0.28%. This indicates that SEACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DHEAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SEACXDHEAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.28%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.64%

0.74%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.72%

1.11%

+2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.85%

1.52%

+3.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.90%

2.27%

+1.63%

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SEACX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than DHEAX's 0.83% expense ratio.


Dividends

SEACX vs. DHEAX - Dividend Comparison

SEACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.34%, less than DHEAX's 5.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHEAX
Diamond Hill Short Duration Securitized Bond Fund
5.64%5.27%5.94%5.25%3.41%2.31%2.92%3.76%3.45%3.20%0.00%0.00%
SEACX
Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund
3.34%2.72%2.78%2.06%1.67%1.41%1.86%2.26%2.22%1.98%2.18%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


SEACX and DHEAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SEACX has higher volatility (1.22%) compared to DHEAX (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEACX dropped -16.96% vs DHEAX's -12.34%.

DHEAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SEACX and DHEAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer