SEACX vs. SCJIX
SEACX (Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund) and SCJIX (Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SEACX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds, while SCJIX is a Derivative Income fund managed by Crossmark Steward Funds. Over the past 5 years, SEACX returned -0.28%/yr vs 8.46%/yr for SCJIX. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SEACX charges 0.72%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for SCJIX.
Performance
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SEACX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than SCJIX's 2.08% return.
SEACX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- -0.83%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 1Y
- 1.42%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.28%
- 10Y*
- 0.93%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.24%
SCJIX
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 2.08%
- 1Y
- 11.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.98%
- 5Y*
- 8.46%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | -0.83% | 6.50% | 1.43% | 5.54% | -11.55% | -2.01% | 4.97% | 6.96% | -0.12% | 0.25% |
SCJIX Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund | 2.08% | 13.28% | 16.96% | 19.43% | -12.28% | 21.59% | 6.97% | 20.76% | -3.65% | -0.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SEACX and SCJIX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2017 | 0.06 |
Over the past year, SEACX and SCJIX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.06, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SEACX vs. SCJIX — Risk / Return Rank
SEACX
SCJIX
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) and Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SEACX | SCJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.20 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.16 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 4.82 | -2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SEACX drawdown since its inception was -16.96%, smaller than the maximum SCJIX drawdown of -29.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SEACX and SCJIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SEACX | SCJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.96% | -29.38% | +12.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -8.52% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.90% | -15.56% | +11.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.28% | -18.12% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.32% | -2.17% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.39% | -3.58% | +1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 2.05% | -0.92% |
Volatility
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund (SEACX) is 0.92%, while Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund (SCJIX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that SEACX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCJIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SEACX | SCJIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 3.12% | -2.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 7.83% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.61% | 9.28% | -5.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.87% | 12.60% | -7.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 14.83% | -10.91% |
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SEACX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than SCJIX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
SEACX vs. SCJIX - Dividend Comparison
SEACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than SCJIX's 8.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCJIX Crossmark Steward Covered Call Income Fund | 8.83% | 9.18% | 12.61% | 8.45% | 9.53% | 25.39% | 15.45% | 7.00% | 10.68% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEACX Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund | 3.44% | 2.72% | 2.78% | 2.06% | 1.67% | 1.41% | 1.86% | 2.26% | 2.22% | 1.98% | 2.18% | 2.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SEACX and SCJIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCJIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to SEACX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SEACX dropped -16.96% vs SCJIX's -29.38%.
SCJIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SEACX and SCJIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer