PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGISX vs. GWOAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGISX achieves a 13.14% return, which is significantly lower than GWOAX's 16.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SGISX having a 11.62% annualized return and GWOAX not far ahead at 12.11%.


SGISX

1D
0.09%
1M
6.47%
YTD
13.14%
6M
12.92%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*
11.62%

GWOAX

1D
0.45%
1M
2.94%
YTD
16.38%
6M
18.04%
1Y
37.95%
3Y*
21.29%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
12.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGISX
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund
13.14%21.79%9.34%15.60%-11.27%19.46%8.55%24.76%-7.78%22.36%
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
16.38%28.37%6.14%22.49%-14.10%18.53%10.53%26.56%-12.95%25.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SGISX and GWOAX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.92

The correlation between SGISX and GWOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGISX vs. GWOAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGISX
SGISX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SGISX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGISX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGISX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SGISX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGISX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GWOAX
GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) and GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGISXGWOAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.55

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

4.33

-0.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.94

17.29

-4.36

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGISX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the GWOAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGISX and GWOAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGISXGWOAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

3.07

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.74

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.47

+0.25

Drawdowns

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGISX drawdown since its inception was -35.59%, smaller than the maximum GWOAX drawdown of -49.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGISX and GWOAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGISXGWOAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.59%

-49.84%

+14.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-8.78%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.71%

-16.11%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.76%

-26.21%

+4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.59%

-35.28%

-0.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

0.00%

-0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.75%

-8.99%

+5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

2.19%

-0.08%

Volatility

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund (SGISX) has a higher volatility of 4.17% compared to GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) at 3.14%. This indicates that SGISX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGISXGWOAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.17%

3.14%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

9.47%

+0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.75%

12.40%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

15.22%

-0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.68%

16.49%

+0.19%

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGISX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GWOAX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGISX vs. GWOAX - Dividend Comparison

SGISX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.63%, more than GWOAX's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWOAX
GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund
3.83%4.46%0.60%6.10%7.27%12.75%3.85%4.33%3.02%3.05%6.43%12.47%
SGISX
Crossmark Steward Global Equity Income Fund
5.63%6.35%5.08%2.67%8.68%16.69%2.43%7.94%10.59%7.58%6.99%8.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGISX and GWOAX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGISX has higher volatility (4.17%) compared to GWOAX (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGISX dropped -35.59% vs GWOAX's -49.84%.

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGISX and GWOAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer