GWOAX vs. SCHG

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

GWOAX (GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both funds - GWOAX is a Global Equities fund managed by GMO, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, GWOAX returned 12.08%/yr vs 18.27%/yr for SCHG. Their 0.80 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GWOAX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.

Performance

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GWOAX achieves a 17.69% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 4.99% return. Over the past 10 years, GWOAX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 12.08%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.27% annualized return.

GWOAX

• 1D: 1.65%
• 1M: 2.23%
• 6M: 11.87%
• YTD: 17.69%
• 1Y: 35.41%
• 3Y*: 18.71%
• 5Y*: 11.65%
• 10Y*: 12.08%
• ALL TIME*: 8.30%

SCHG

• 1D: 1.12%
• 1M: 0.15%
• 6M: 7.02%
• YTD: 4.99%
• 1Y: 16.16%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: 18.27%
• ALL TIME*: 16.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	$247.66M	$249.87M	$339.91M

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	17.69%	28.37%	6.14%	22.49%	-14.10%	18.53%	10.53%	26.56%	-12.95%	25.63%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	4.99%	17.50%	34.95%	50.10%	-31.80%	28.11%	39.14%	36.02%	-1.36%	28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between GWOAX and SCHG is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2009	0.80

The correlation between GWOAX and SCHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (3 years) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GWOAX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GWOAX

GWOAX Risk / Return Rank: 93
GWOAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
GWOAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
GWOAX Omega Ratio Rank: 89
GWOAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
GWOAX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

SCHG

SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 30
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 31
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GWOAX	SCHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	0.82	+1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	1.20	+2.43
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.15	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.86	0.83	+3.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.33	2.62	+12.71

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GWOAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is higher than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GWOAX and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GWOAX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GWOAX and SCHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	GWOAX	SCHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.84%	-34.59%	-15.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-16.41%	+7.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.11%	-23.39%	+7.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.21%	-34.59%	+8.38%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.28%	-34.59%	-0.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.10%	+3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.93%	-5.19%	-3.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.21%	5.19%	-2.98%

Volatility

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund (GWOAX) is 3.27%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that GWOAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GWOAX	SCHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.27%	4.32%	-1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.21%	12.90%	-2.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.89%	16.67%	-3.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.23%	22.42%	-7.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.39%	21.59%	-5.20%

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

GWOAX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

GWOAX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

GWOAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GWOAX GMO Global Developed Equity Allocation Fund	5.37%	4.46%	0.60%	6.10%	7.27%	12.75%	3.85%	4.33%	3.02%	3.05%	6.43%	12.47%
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF	0.38%	0.36%	0.39%	0.46%	0.55%	0.42%	0.52%	0.82%	1.27%	1.01%	1.04%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GWOAX and SCHG in my portfolio?

GWOAX and SCHG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GWOAX or SCHG?

SCHG has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to GWOAX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GWOAX dropped -49.84% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GWOAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.