PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGHC vs. SHW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SGHC vs. SHW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGHC achieves a 16.40% return, which is significantly higher than SHW's -1.61% return.


SGHC

1D
-2.46%
1M
3.30%
YTD
16.40%
6M
22.02%
1Y
46.16%
3Y*
59.82%
5Y*
10Y*

SHW

1D
0.13%
1M
3.85%
YTD
-1.61%
6M
-3.00%
1Y
-10.09%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
13.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGHC vs. SHW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
16.40%95.00%107.65%5.67%-65.12%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
-1.61%-3.83%9.90%32.73%-15.39%

Correlation

The correlation between SGHC and SHW is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.24

The correlation between SGHC and SHW shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SGHC:

$6.82B

SHW:

$78.72B

EPS

SGHC:

$0.40

SHW:

$10.42

PE Ratio

SGHC:

33.42

SHW:

30.45

PEG Ratio

SGHC:

1.41

SHW:

2.96

PS Ratio

SGHC:

3.17

SHW:

3.31

PB Ratio

SGHC:

9.98

SHW:

17.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

SGHC:

$2.15B

SHW:

$23.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SGHC:

$617.43M

SHW:

$11.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

SGHC:

$394.23M

SHW:

$4.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGHC vs. SHW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGHC
SGHC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SGHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGHC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SGHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SHW
SHW Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SHW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHW Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SHW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHW Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGHC vs. SHW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGHCSHWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.95

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

-0.47

+1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

-0.99

+3.81

SGHC vs. SHW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the SHW Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGHC and SHW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGHC vs. SHW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGHC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, which is greater than SHW's maximum drawdown of -52.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHC and SHW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGHCSHWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.02%

-52.02%

-24.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.67%

-21.36%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.67%

-25.69%

-11.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

-19.53%

+16.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-11.63%

-33.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.39%

10.28%

+6.11%

Volatility

SGHC vs. SHW - Volatility Comparison

Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a higher volatility of 11.00% compared to The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) at 9.00%. This indicates that SGHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGHCSHWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

9.00%

+2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.97%

19.26%

+11.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.31%

25.46%

+20.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.48%

26.27%

+33.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.48%

26.58%

+32.90%

Dividends

SGHC vs. SHW - Dividend Comparison

SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than SHW's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
3.12%1.34%4.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
1.00%0.98%0.84%0.78%1.01%0.62%0.73%0.77%0.87%0.83%1.25%1.03%

Financials

SGHC vs. SHW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Super Group (SGHC) Limited and The Sherwin-Williams Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
578.00M
5.67B
(SGHC) Total Revenue
(SHW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SGHC vs. SHW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Super Group (SGHC) Limited and The Sherwin-Williams Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
24.2%
49.1%
Portfolio components
SGHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.

SHW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a gross profit of 2.78B and revenue of 5.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.1%.

SGHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

SHW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported an operating income of 810.90M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.3%.

SGHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

SHW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Sherwin-Williams Company reported a net income of 534.70M and revenue of 5.67B, resulting in a net margin of 9.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SGHC and SHW have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGHC has higher volatility (11.00%) compared to SHW (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGHC dropped -76.02% vs SHW's -52.02%.

SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGHC and SHW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer