SGHC vs. BETZ
SGHC (Super Group (SGHC) Limited) is a stock, while BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) is Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. Over the past 3 years, SGHC returned 72.96%/yr vs 3.15%/yr for BETZ. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
SGHC vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGHC achieves a 21.34% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -8.87% return.
SGHC
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- 6M
- 53.11%
- YTD
- 21.34%
- 1Y
- 36.79%
- 3Y*
- 72.96%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.10%
BETZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- -8.87%
- 1Y
- -16.95%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- -5.84%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.39%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $205.48K | $310.34K | $782.30K | |
| $38.02M | $39.29M | $47.20M |
SGHC vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 21.34% | 95.00% | 107.65% | 5.67% | -65.12% |
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -8.87% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -29.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGHC and BETZ is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between SGHC and BETZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGHC vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank
SGHC
BETZ
SGHC vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGHC | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.60 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.88 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | -0.60 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.21 | -0.93 | +3.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGHC vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGHC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, which is greater than BETZ's maximum drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHC and BETZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGHC | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.02% | -60.82% | -15.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.67% | -29.20% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.67% | -29.20% | -8.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -59.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.20% | -38.35% | +28.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.28% | -33.89% | -10.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.26% | 18.92% | -2.66% |
Volatility
SGHC vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison
Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a higher volatility of 14.38% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 5.96%. This indicates that SGHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGHC | BETZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.38% | 5.96% | +8.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.09% | 17.04% | +14.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.84% | 21.17% | +25.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.06% | 26.97% | +32.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.06% | 27.85% | +31.21% |
Dividends
SGHC vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison
SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than BETZ's 5.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.02% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited | 3.07% | 1.34% | 4.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGHC and BETZ have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGHC has higher volatility (14.38%) compared to BETZ (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGHC dropped -76.02% vs BETZ's -60.82%.
SGHC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGHC and BETZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer