SGHC vs. BETZ

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ).

BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020.

Performance

SGHC vs. BETZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SGHC vs. BETZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited	-5.79%	95.00%	107.65%	5.67%	-63.64%
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-13.39%	15.75%	10.22%	21.17%	-31.01%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGHC achieves a -5.79% return, which is significantly higher than BETZ's -13.39% return.

SGHC

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: -5.79%
• 6M: -16.50%
• 1Y: 73.21%
• 3Y*: 44.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BETZ

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: -13.39%
• 6M: -19.50%
• 1Y: 0.94%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: -9.33%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

SGHC vs. BETZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGHC

SGHC Risk / Return Rank: 79
SGHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
SGHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
SGHC Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SGHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SGHC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 13
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 12
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGHC vs. BETZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SGHC	BETZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	0.04	+1.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	0.23	+2.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.03	+0.25
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	0.04	+2.00
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.88	0.08	+4.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SGHC vs. BETZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is higher than the BETZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGHC and BETZ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SGHC	BETZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.57	0.04	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.34	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.11	+0.05

Correlation

The correlation between SGHC and BETZ is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

SGHC vs. BETZ - Dividend Comparison

SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than BETZ's 5.28% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SGHC Super Group (SGHC) Limited	3.85%	1.34%	4.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	5.28%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%

Drawdowns

SGHC vs. BETZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGHC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, which is greater than BETZ's maximum drawdown of -60.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHC and BETZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGHC	BETZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.02%	-60.82%	-15.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-37.67%	-29.20%	-8.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-60.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.82%	-41.41%	+21.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-47.31%	-33.65%	-13.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.72%	14.15%	+1.57%

Volatility

SGHC vs. BETZ - Volatility Comparison

Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) has a higher volatility of 11.32% compared to Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) at 8.24%. This indicates that SGHC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BETZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGHC	BETZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.32%	8.24%	+3.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.00%	15.73%	+18.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.04%	23.04%	+24.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	60.20%	27.26%	+32.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	60.20%	28.13%	+32.07%