PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGHC vs. IESC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SGHC vs. IESC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGHC achieves a 16.40% return, which is significantly lower than IESC's 92.75% return.


SGHC

1D
-2.46%
1M
2.59%
YTD
16.40%
6M
22.02%
1Y
48.01%
3Y*
59.82%
5Y*
10Y*

IESC

1D
2.53%
1M
9.91%
YTD
92.75%
6M
62.95%
1Y
186.31%
3Y*
139.60%
5Y*
70.53%
10Y*
48.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGHC vs. IESC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
16.40%95.00%107.65%5.67%-65.12%
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
92.75%93.58%153.67%122.72%-25.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SGHC and IESC is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2022

0.24

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SGHC:

$6.82B

IESC:

$15.14B

EPS

SGHC:

$0.40

IESC:

$18.85

PE Ratio

SGHC:

33.42

IESC:

39.78

PEG Ratio

SGHC:

1.41

IESC:

0.48

PS Ratio

SGHC:

3.17

IESC:

4.17

PB Ratio

SGHC:

9.98

IESC:

14.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

SGHC:

$2.15B

IESC:

$3.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SGHC:

$617.43M

IESC:

$931.31M

EBITDA (TTM)

SGHC:

$394.23M

IESC:

$487.14M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGHC vs. IESC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGHC
SGHC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SGHC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGHC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGHC Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SGHC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGHC Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IESC
IESC Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IESC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IESC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
IESC Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
IESC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
IESC Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGHC vs. IESC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) and IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SGHCIESCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.40

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

8.09

-6.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.82

22.98

-20.15

SGHC vs. IESC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGHC Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the IESC Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGHC and IESC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SGHC vs. IESC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGHC drawdown since its inception was -76.02%, smaller than the maximum IESC drawdown of -98.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGHC and IESC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGHCIESCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.02%

-98.32%

+22.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.67%

-21.80%

-15.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.67%

-49.23%

+11.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.81%

0.00%

-2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.51%

-54.97%

+9.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.39%

7.66%

+8.73%

Volatility

SGHC vs. IESC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Super Group (SGHC) Limited (SGHC) is 11.00%, while IES Holdings, Inc. (IESC) has a volatility of 15.69%. This indicates that SGHC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IESC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGHCIESCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.00%

15.69%

-4.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.97%

50.65%

-19.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.31%

62.74%

-16.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.48%

54.09%

+5.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.48%

48.19%

+11.29%

Dividends

SGHC vs. IESC - Dividend Comparison

SGHC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while IESC has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024
IESC
IES Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
SGHC
Super Group (SGHC) Limited
3.12%1.34%4.01%

Financials

SGHC vs. IESC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Super Group (SGHC) Limited and IES Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M900.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
578.00M
974.20M
(SGHC) Total Revenue
(IESC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SGHC vs. IESC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Super Group (SGHC) Limited and IES Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%20222023202420252026
24.2%
24.5%
Portfolio components
SGHC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a gross profit of 140.00M and revenue of 578.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.

IESC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 238.70M and revenue of 974.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.5%.

SGHC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported an operating income of 100.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.3%.

IESC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 112.30M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.5%.

SGHC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Group (SGHC) Limited reported a net income of 67.00M and revenue of 578.00M, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.

IESC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, IES Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 110.00M and revenue of 974.20M, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SGHC and IESC have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IESC has higher volatility (15.69%) compared to SGHC (11.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGHC dropped -76.02% vs IESC's -98.32%.

IESC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGHC and IESC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer