PortfoliosLab logo
BETZ vs. BJK
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and BJK is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

BETZ vs. BJK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
25.07%
6.70%
BETZ
BJK

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BETZ:

0.85

BJK:

-0.21

Sortino Ratio

BETZ:

1.31

BJK:

-0.14

Omega Ratio

BETZ:

1.17

BJK:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

BETZ:

0.39

BJK:

-0.12

Martin Ratio

BETZ:

3.40

BJK:

-0.63

Ulcer Index

BETZ:

5.86%

BJK:

7.49%

Daily Std Dev

BETZ:

23.42%

BJK:

22.79%

Max Drawdown

BETZ:

-60.82%

BJK:

-71.12%

Current Drawdown

BETZ:

-38.81%

BJK:

-30.53%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly higher than BJK's -7.84% return.


BETZ

YTD

4.70%

1M

-0.94%

6M

7.17%

1Y

18.97%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BJK

YTD

-7.84%

1M

-5.91%

6M

-11.93%

1Y

-4.19%

5Y*

6.30%

10Y*

1.93%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BETZ vs. BJK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BJK's 0.66% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for BETZ: current value is 0.75%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BETZ: 0.75%
Expense ratio chart for BJK: current value is 0.66%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BJK: 0.66%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BETZ vs. BJK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BETZ is 7272
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BETZ is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BETZ is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BETZ is 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BETZ is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BETZ is 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

BJK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BJK is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BJK is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BJK is 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BJK is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BJK is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BJK is 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BETZ vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 0.85, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
BETZ: 0.85
BJK: -0.21
The chart of Sortino ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BETZ: 1.31
BJK: -0.14
The chart of Omega ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BETZ: 1.17
BJK: 0.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
BETZ: 0.39
BJK: -0.12
The chart of Martin ratio for BETZ, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
BETZ: 3.40
BJK: -0.63

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the BJK Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and BJK, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.85
-0.21
BETZ
BJK

Dividends

BETZ vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than BJK's 3.12% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BETZ
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF
0.82%0.85%0.00%0.66%0.00%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BJK
VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF
3.12%2.88%1.68%0.44%0.79%0.47%2.95%3.43%2.31%3.15%4.09%4.90%

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum BJK drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and BJK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-45.00%-40.00%-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-38.81%
-30.53%
BETZ
BJK

Volatility

BETZ vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) have volatilities of 13.16% and 13.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
13.16%
13.17%
BETZ
BJK