BETZ vs. BJK
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK).
BETZ and BJK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. Both BETZ and BJK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BETZ or BJK.
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and BJK is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BETZ vs. BJK - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BETZ:
0.97
BJK:
0.14
BETZ:
1.44
BJK:
0.31
BETZ:
1.18
BJK:
1.04
BETZ:
0.37
BJK:
0.08
BETZ:
3.35
BJK:
0.36
BETZ:
5.54%
BJK:
7.12%
BETZ:
19.05%
BJK:
18.94%
BETZ:
-60.82%
BJK:
-71.12%
BETZ:
-40.95%
BJK:
-25.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a 1.03% return, which is significantly higher than BJK's -1.26% return.
BETZ
1.03%
-0.16%
10.72%
12.72%
N/A
N/A
BJK
-1.26%
-2.63%
1.62%
-1.87%
0.21%
3.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BETZ vs. BJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BJK's 0.66% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BETZ vs. BJK — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BETZ
BJK
BETZ vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BETZ vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%, less than BJK's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 0.85% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 2.91% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% | 4.90% |
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum BJK drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and BJK. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BETZ vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) at 5.33%. This indicates that BETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.