BETZ vs. BJK
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK).
BETZ and BJK are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BETZ is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2020. BJK is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the S-Network Global Gaming Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 2008. Both BETZ and BJK are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BETZ vs. BJK - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BETZ vs. BJK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | -14.85% | 15.75% | 10.22% | 21.17% | -42.02% | -3.91% | 60.54% |
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | -15.50% | 4.15% | -1.39% | 11.52% | -12.83% | -4.30% | 26.20% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BETZ having a -14.85% return and BJK slightly lower at -15.50%.
BETZ
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -14.85%
- 6M
- -21.76%
- 1Y
- -0.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.07%
- 5Y*
- -9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
BJK
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.85%
- YTD
- -15.50%
- 6M
- -20.33%
- 1Y
- -4.61%
- 3Y*
- -5.58%
- 5Y*
- -6.99%
- 10Y*
- 2.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BETZ vs. BJK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than BJK's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BETZ vs. BJK — Risk / Return Rank
BETZ
BJK
BETZ vs. BJK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BETZ | BJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | -0.21 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.13 | -0.17 | +0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 0.98 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | -0.23 | +0.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.14 | -0.56 | +0.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BETZ | BJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 | -0.21 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.36 | -0.29 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.05 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BETZ and BJK is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BETZ vs. BJK - Dividend Comparison
BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.37%, more than BJK's 3.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF | 5.37% | 4.57% | 0.86% | 0.00% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BJK VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF | 3.95% | 3.34% | 2.88% | 1.68% | 0.44% | 0.79% | 0.47% | 2.95% | 3.43% | 2.31% | 3.15% | 4.09% |
Drawdowns
BETZ vs. BJK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, smaller than the maximum BJK drawdown of -71.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and BJK.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BETZ | BJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.82% | -71.12% | +10.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.20% | -26.40% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.82% | -43.48% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.39% | -33.66% | -8.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.64% | -24.48% | -9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.06% | 11.13% | +2.93% |
Volatility
BETZ vs. BJK - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to VanEck Vectors Gaming ETF (BJK) at 7.04%. This indicates that BETZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BJK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BETZ | BJK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 7.04% | +1.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | 13.39% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.02% | 21.82% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 24.49% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.13% | 25.03% | +3.10% |