SGDJ vs. XLB
SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Materials funds - SGDJ tracks the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index while XLB tracks the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ returned 11.82%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for XLB. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
SGDJ vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 14.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed XLB with an annualized return of 11.82%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.
SGDJ
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 11.75%
- 1Y
- 79.24%
- 3Y*
- 49.70%
- 5Y*
- 17.26%
- 10Y*
- 11.82%
XLB
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- 14.33%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
SGDJ vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 2.34% | 174.44% | 19.35% | 6.66% | -27.60% | -15.12% | 47.91% | 37.00% | -25.63% | 5.94% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14.33% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGDJ and XLB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015 | 0.30 |
The correlation between SGDJ and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SGDJ vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SGDJ
XLB
Basic Materials
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
SGDJ
XLB
Communication Services
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Consumer Cyclical
SGDJ
-
XLB
Consumer Defensive
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Energy
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Financial Services
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Healthcare
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Industrials
SGDJ
-
XLB
Real Estate
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Technology
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Utilities
SGDJ
-
XLB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGDJ vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
SGDJ
XLB
SGDJ vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGDJ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.20 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.58 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.31 | 4.93 | +1.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGDJ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.17 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.28 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.49 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.36 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SGDJ vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGDJ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.27% | -59.83% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.22% | -12.38% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.22% | -23.17% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.90% | -24.72% | -30.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.27% | -37.27% | -22.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.38% | -3.30% | -22.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.25% | -10.84% | -15.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.60% | 3.97% | +8.63% |
Volatility
SGDJ vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.47%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGDJ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 5.47% | +7.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.87% | 12.81% | +27.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.32% | 16.75% | +31.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.27% | 18.94% | +21.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.73% | 20.64% | +20.09% |
SGDJ vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
SGDJ vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than XLB's 1.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF | 8.18% | 8.37% | 6.55% | 4.55% | 2.46% | 2.20% | 1.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 1.77% | 0.85% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SGDJ and XLB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SGDJ has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to XLB (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs XLB's -59.83%.
On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 11.82% vs 10.12% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.
SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.69% for XLB.
SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.13% for XLB.
SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGDJ and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer