PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGDJ vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SGDJ vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than XLB's 14.33% return. Over the past 10 years, SGDJ has outperformed XLB with an annualized return of 11.82%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.


SGDJ

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
2.34%
6M
11.75%
1Y
79.24%
3Y*
49.70%
5Y*
17.26%
10Y*
11.82%

XLB

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.17%
YTD
14.33%
6M
17.82%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
11.73%
5Y*
5.35%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
2.34%174.44%19.35%6.66%-27.60%-15.12%47.91%37.00%-25.63%5.94%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
14.33%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and XLB is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015

0.30

The correlation between SGDJ and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SGDJ vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SGDJ
XLB

Basic Materials

100.0%
87.6%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

12.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

1.5%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

SGDJ
100.0%
XLB
87.6%

Communication Services

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

SGDJ

-

XLB
12.4%

Consumer Defensive

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Energy

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Financial Services

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Healthcare

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Industrials

SGDJ

-

XLB
1.5%

Real Estate

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Technology

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Utilities

SGDJ

-

XLB

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ
SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGDJXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.20

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

1.58

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.31

4.93

+1.38

SGDJ vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGDJXLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.17

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.28

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.49

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.36

0.00

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, roughly equal to the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGDJXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.27%

-59.83%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.22%

-12.38%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.22%

-23.17%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.90%

-24.72%

-30.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.27%

-37.27%

-22.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.38%

-3.30%

-22.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.25%

-10.84%

-15.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.60%

3.97%

+8.63%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 5.47%. This indicates that SGDJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGDJXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.16%

5.47%

+7.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.87%

12.81%

+27.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.32%

16.75%

+31.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.27%

18.94%

+21.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.73%

20.64%

+20.09%

SGDJ vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

SGDJ vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, more than XLB's 1.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SGDJ
Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF
8.18%8.37%6.55%4.55%2.46%2.20%1.97%0.65%0.00%0.14%1.77%0.85%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.69%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


SGDJ and XLB have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGDJ has higher volatility (13.16%) compared to XLB (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, SGDJ leads with 11.82% vs 10.12% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 5.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 11.82% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SGDJ.

SGDJ has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 1.69% for XLB.

SGDJ tracks Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 0.13% for XLB.

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGDJ and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer