SGDJ vs. HOOX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

SGDJ (Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF) and HOOX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SGDJ is a Gold fund tracking the Solactive Junior Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, while HOOX is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Defiance. SGDJ is passively managed, while HOOX is actively managed. Over the past year, SGDJ returned 67.69% vs -35.92% for HOOX. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SGDJ charges 0.50%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for HOOX.

Performance

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGDJ achieves a -10.12% return, which is significantly higher than HOOX's -52.20% return.

SGDJ

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: -14.44%
• YTD: -10.12%
• 6M: -13.19%
• 1Y: 67.69%
• 3Y*: 47.56%
• 5Y*: 16.10%
• 10Y*: 9.57%

HOOX

• 1D: -7.92%
• 1M: 47.84%
• YTD: -52.20%
• 6M: -58.12%
• 1Y: -35.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	-10.12%	116.11%
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	-52.20%	342.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SGDJ and HOOX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2025	0.20

The correlation between SGDJ and HOOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SGDJ	HOOX
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	100.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SGDJ vs. HOOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGDJ

SGDJ Risk / Return Rank: 39
SGDJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
SGDJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
SGDJ Omega Ratio Rank: 41
SGDJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
SGDJ Martin Ratio Rank: 35

HOOX

HOOX Risk / Return Rank: 9
HOOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
HOOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
HOOX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
HOOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
HOOX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SGDJ	HOOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	-0.26	+1.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	0.56	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.07	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.85	-0.41	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	-0.64	+5.32

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGDJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the HOOX Sharpe Ratio of -0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGDJ and HOOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGDJ drawdown since its inception was -59.27%, smaller than the maximum HOOX drawdown of -87.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGDJ and HOOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SGDJ	HOOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.27%	-87.11%	+27.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.84%	-87.11%	+50.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-36.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.66%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-34.47%	-77.87%	+43.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.26%	-39.19%	+12.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.51%	56.62%	-42.11%

Volatility

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF (SGDJ) is 18.98%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF (HOOX) has a volatility of 49.49%. This indicates that SGDJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SGDJ	HOOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.98%	49.49%	-30.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.78%	103.01%	-60.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.05%	139.70%	-88.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.94%	144.16%	-103.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.98%	144.16%	-103.18%

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SGDJ has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HOOX's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

SGDJ vs. HOOX - Dividend Comparison

SGDJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, less than HOOX's 29.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HOOX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF	29.54%	14.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SGDJ Sprott Junior Gold Miners ETF	9.31%	8.37%	6.55%	4.55%	2.46%	2.20%	1.97%	0.65%	0.00%	0.14%	1.77%	0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SGDJ and HOOX in my portfolio?

SGDJ and HOOX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SGDJ or HOOX?

HOOX has higher volatility (49.49%) compared to SGDJ (18.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGDJ dropped -59.27% vs HOOX's -87.11%.

Which ETF is better, SGDJ or HOOX?

On 1-year performance, SGDJ leads with 67.69% vs -35.92% for HOOX. On fees, SGDJ is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SGDJ has been the lower-risk option at 18.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SGDJ or HOOX?

Over the 1-year period, SGDJ has performed better with a 67.69% return vs -35.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SGDJ or HOOX?

SGDJ is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for HOOX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SGDJ or HOOX?

HOOX has the higher dividend yield at 29.54%, compared with 9.31% for SGDJ.

What is the main difference between SGDJ and HOOX?

SGDJ is categorized as Gold, while HOOX is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SGDJ and 1.31% for HOOX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGDJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.