SGC vs. TRNS
SGC (Superior Group of Companies, Inc.) and TRNS (Transcat, Inc.) are both stocks. SGC operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while TRNS operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, SGC returned 0.09%/yr vs 23.86%/yr for TRNS. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
SGC vs. TRNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGC achieves a 25.57% return, which is significantly lower than TRNS's 50.48% return. Over the past 10 years, SGC has underperformed TRNS with an annualized return of 0.09%, while TRNS has yielded a comparatively higher 23.86% annualized return.
SGC
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -9.13%
- 6M
- 22.04%
- YTD
- 25.57%
- 1Y
- 30.70%
- 3Y*
- 14.21%
- 5Y*
- -8.86%
- 10Y*
- 0.09%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.65%
TRNS
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -4.11%
- 6M
- 41.55%
- YTD
- 50.48%
- 1Y
- 14.51%
- 3Y*
- -0.82%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 23.86%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $482.11K | $499.63K | $590.15K | |
TRNS Transcat, Inc. | $9.29M | $10.62M | $13.98M |
SGC vs. TRNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGC Superior Group of Companies, Inc. | 25.57% | -38.45% | 26.91% | 42.28% | -52.39% | -3.86% | 75.53% | -21.25% | -32.68% | 38.61% |
TRNS Transcat, Inc. | 50.48% | -46.35% | -3.28% | 54.27% | -23.33% | 166.52% | 8.85% | 67.51% | 33.47% | 31.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGC and TRNS is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992 | 0.08 |
The correlation between SGC and TRNS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SGC:
$185.26M
TRNS:
$799.05M
SGC:
$0.57
TRNS:
$0.57
SGC:
20.71
TRNS:
148.60
SGC:
0.31
TRNS:
2.41
SGC:
0.92
TRNS:
2.65
SGC:
$569.97M
TRNS:
$331.88M
SGC:
$214.76M
TRNS:
$108.40M
SGC:
$26.11M
TRNS:
$33.66M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGC vs. TRNS — Risk / Return Rank
SGC
TRNS
SGC vs. TRNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) and Transcat, Inc. (TRNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SGC | TRNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.08 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.81 | 0.27 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.50 | 0.53 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SGC vs. TRNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGC drawdown since its inception was -75.33%, smaller than the maximum TRNS drawdown of -93.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGC and TRNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGC | TRNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.33% | -93.42% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.29% | -42.92% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.12% | -63.86% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.29% | -63.86% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.33% | -63.86% | -11.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.55% | -40.74% | -6.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.68% | -35.39% | +7.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 19.63% | 22.09% | -2.46% |
Volatility
SGC vs. TRNS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) is 10.22%, while Transcat, Inc. (TRNS) has a volatility of 12.81%. This indicates that SGC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGC | TRNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.22% | 12.81% | -2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.10% | 34.24% | -1.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.06% | 48.00% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.50% | 43.47% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 42.60% | +8.80% |
Dividends
SGC vs. TRNS - Dividend Comparison
SGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, while TRNS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGC Superior Group of Companies, Inc. | 4.73% | 5.79% | 3.39% | 4.15% | 5.37% | 2.10% | 1.72% | 2.95% | 2.21% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 1.86% |
TRNS Transcat, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SGC vs. TRNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Superior Group of Companies, Inc. and Transcat, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SGC vs. TRNS - Profitability Comparison
SGC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.33M and revenue of 140.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.
TRNS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Transcat, Inc. reported a gross profit of 30.47M and revenue of 88.62M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.4%.
SGC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.05M and revenue of 140.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.
TRNS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Transcat, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.73M and revenue of 88.62M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
SGC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 834.00K and revenue of 140.88M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.
TRNS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Transcat, Inc. reported a net income of 744.00K and revenue of 88.62M, resulting in a net margin of 0.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGC and TRNS have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRNS has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to SGC (10.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGC dropped -75.33% vs TRNS's -93.42%.
SGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SGC and TRNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer