PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SGC vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SGC vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SGC achieves a 34.25% return, which is significantly higher than LLY's 0.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SGC has underperformed LLY with an annualized return of -0.90%, while LLY has yielded a comparatively higher 32.66% annualized return.


SGC

1D
-1.25%
1M
11.10%
YTD
34.25%
6M
28.93%
1Y
33.59%
3Y*
18.63%
5Y*
-8.80%
10Y*
-0.90%

LLY

1D
1.37%
1M
11.64%
YTD
0.72%
6M
4.73%
1Y
44.70%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
41.13%
10Y*
32.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SGC vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SGC
Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
34.25%-38.45%26.91%42.28%-52.39%-3.86%75.53%-21.25%-32.68%38.61%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.72%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%66.08%31.04%16.14%40.45%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SGC and LLY is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 1992

0.04

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SGC:

$189.01M

LLY:

$966.48B

EPS

SGC:

$0.57

LLY:

$28.14

PE Ratio

SGC:

22.18

LLY:

38.33

PS Ratio

SGC:

0.33

LLY:

13.41

PB Ratio

SGC:

0.98

LLY:

30.98

Total Revenue (TTM)

SGC:

$569.97M

LLY:

$72.25B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SGC:

$214.76M

LLY:

$59.75B

EBITDA (TTM)

SGC:

$26.11M

LLY:

$32.97B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SGC vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SGC
SGC Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGC Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGC Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SGC vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SGCLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.24

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

1.90

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.72

4.73

-3.01

SGC vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SGC Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SGC and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SGCLLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.19

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

1.26

-1.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

1.09

-1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.57

-0.42

Drawdowns

SGC vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SGC drawdown since its inception was -75.33%, which is greater than LLY's maximum drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGC and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SGCLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.33%

-68.24%

-7.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.29%

-23.64%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.12%

-34.48%

-23.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-71.29%

-34.48%

-36.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.33%

-34.48%

-40.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.93%

-4.26%

-39.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.61%

-19.22%

-8.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.60%

9.49%

+10.11%

Volatility

SGC vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

Superior Group of Companies, Inc. (SGC) has a higher volatility of 14.47% compared to Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) at 9.16%. This indicates that SGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SGCLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.47%

9.16%

+5.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.94%

26.81%

-1.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.48%

37.88%

+5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.51%

32.79%

+13.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.14%

30.14%

+21.00%

Dividends

SGC vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

SGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, more than LLY's 0.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.60%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
SGC
Superior Group of Companies, Inc.
4.42%5.79%3.39%4.15%5.37%2.10%1.72%2.95%2.21%1.37%1.73%1.86%

Financials

SGC vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Superior Group of Companies, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20222023202420252026
140.88M
19.80B
(SGC) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SGC vs. LLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Superior Group of Companies, Inc. and Eli Lilly and Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
37.2%
79.0%
Portfolio components
SGC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 52.33M and revenue of 140.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.2%.

LLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a gross profit of 15.64B and revenue of 19.80B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.

SGC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.05M and revenue of 140.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.8%.

LLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported an operating income of 9.19B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in an operating margin of 46.4%.

SGC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Superior Group of Companies, Inc. reported a net income of 834.00K and revenue of 140.88M, resulting in a net margin of 0.6%.

LLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Eli Lilly and Company reported a net income of 7.40B and revenue of 19.80B, resulting in a net margin of 37.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SGC and LLY have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGC has higher volatility (14.47%) compared to LLY (9.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SGC dropped -75.33% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SGC and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer