SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L
SGBX.L (WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold) and SSLN.L (iShares Physical Silver ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - SGBX.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold, while SSLN.L is a Silver fund tracking the LBMA Silver Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SGBX.L returned 19.84%/yr vs 22.99%/yr for SSLN.L. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SGBX.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSLN.L.
Performance
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGBX.L achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than SSLN.L's 3.18% return.
SGBX.L
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- 1Y
- 34.31%
- 3Y*
- 28.08%
- 5Y*
- 19.84%
- 10Y*
- —
SSLN.L
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 3.18%
- 6M
- 25.57%
- 1Y
- 108.67%
- 3Y*
- 42.31%
- 5Y*
- 22.99%
- 10Y*
- 16.71%
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGBX.L WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold | 3.86% | 53.55% | 28.13% | 7.24% | 12.36% | -3.37% | 20.00% | 14.67% | 4.35% | -3.78% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 3.18% | 130.26% | 23.21% | -6.20% | 15.75% | -11.64% | 40.73% | 12.68% | -3.48% | -13.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SGBX.L and SSLN.L is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2017 | 0.66 |
The correlation between SGBX.L and SSLN.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SGBX.L
SSLN.L
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGBX.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 2.98 | -1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.94 | 6.53 | -1.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGBX.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.44 | 2.11 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.23 | 0.70 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.17 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGBX.L drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -69.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGBX.L and SSLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGBX.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -69.95% | +47.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.07% | -38.72% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.07% | -38.72% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -38.72% | +20.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.26% | -33.62% | +17.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -45.32% | +39.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.76% | 17.69% | -10.93% |
Volatility
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) is 5.08%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that SGBX.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SGBX.L | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 16.31% | -11.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.94% | 51.81% | -31.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.13% | 54.53% | -31.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 33.31% | -17.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 29.69% | -14.52% |
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGBX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SGBX.L vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGBX.L nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SGBX.L and SSLN.L have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGBX.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGBX.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSLN.L.
SGBX.L is categorized as Precious Metals, while SSLN.L is Silver. SGBX.L tracks Gold, while SSLN.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SGBX.L and 0.20% for SSLN.L.
Find the right allocation for SGBX.L and SSLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer