SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE).
SGBX.L and XMAW.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SGBX.L is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Dec 16, 2009. XMAW.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Feb 10, 2014. Both SGBX.L and XMAW.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGBX.L WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold | 11.94% | 53.55% | 28.13% | 7.24% | 12.36% | -3.37% | 20.00% | 14.67% | 4.35% | -3.78% |
XMAW.DE Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C | -1.38% | 14.65% | 19.92% | 17.07% | -10.35% | 19.63% | 11.46% | 23.38% | -4.88% | 9.43% |
Different Trading Currencies
SGBX.L is traded in GBp, while XMAW.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the XMAW.DE values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGBX.L achieves a 11.94% return, which is significantly higher than XMAW.DE's -1.34% return.
SGBX.L
- 1D
- 2.66%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- 11.94%
- 6M
- 25.04%
- 1Y
- 47.97%
- 3Y*
- 30.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.28%
- 10Y*
- —
XMAW.DE
- 1D
- 2.60%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- YTD
- -1.34%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 14.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 12.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGBX.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMAW.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SGBX.L
XMAW.DE
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) and Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGBX.L | XMAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.97 | 1.19 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.44 | 1.67 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.25 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.69 | 2.38 | +0.30 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 9.51 | +1.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGBX.L | XMAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 1.19 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.45 | 0.74 | +0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.77 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGBX.L and XMAW.DE is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SGBX.L nor XMAW.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGBX.L drawdown since its inception was -22.29%, smaller than the maximum XMAW.DE drawdown of -26.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGBX.L and XMAW.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGBX.L | XMAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.29% | -33.49% | +11.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.07% | -13.45% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.07% | -22.10% | +4.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -4.55% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.94% | -4.96% | -0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.24% | 2.14% | +2.10% |
Volatility
SGBX.L vs. XMAW.DE - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Physical Swiss Gold (SGBX.L) has a higher volatility of 11.53% compared to Xtrackers MSCI AC World ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XMAW.DE) at 4.95%. This indicates that SGBX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMAW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGBX.L | XMAW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.53% | 4.95% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 9.11% | +12.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.21% | 15.75% | +8.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 13.88% | +2.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 15.01% | +0.13% |