SFYX vs. JHMM
SFYX (SoFi Next 500 ETF) and JHMM (John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - SFYX tracks the Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index while JHMM tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFYX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for JHMM.
Performance
SFYX vs. JHMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JHMM
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 3.21%
- YTD
- 12.60%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 24.83%
- 3Y*
- 17.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.39%
- 10Y*
- 11.88%
SFYX vs. JHMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 5.66% | 14.25% | 14.45% | 17.70% | -22.88% | 18.89% | 17.63% | 6.95% |
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 12.60% | 10.73% | 14.61% | 14.53% | -15.30% | 24.54% | 16.22% | 9.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYX and JHMM is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019 | 0.93 |
The correlation between SFYX and JHMM shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.93 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SFYX vs. JHMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SFYX
JHMM
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Industrials
SFYX
JHMM
Technology
SFYX
JHMM
Financial Services
SFYX
JHMM
Healthcare
SFYX
JHMM
Consumer Cyclical
SFYX
JHMM
Real Estate
SFYX
JHMM
Communication Services
SFYX
JHMM
Energy
SFYX
JHMM
Basic Materials
SFYX
JHMM
Consumer Defensive
SFYX
JHMM
Utilities
SFYX
JHMM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYX vs. JHMM — Risk / Return Rank
SFYX
JHMM
SFYX vs. JHMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Next 500 ETF (SFYX) and John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF (JHMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFYX | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.63 | — |
Drawdowns
SFYX vs. JHMM - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYX | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -40.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.24% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.43% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.23% | — |
Volatility
SFYX vs. JHMM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYX | JHMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 14.12% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 18.32% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.60% | — |
SFYX vs. JHMM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than JHMM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYX vs. JHMM - Dividend Comparison
SFYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than JHMM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHMM John Hancock Multifactor Mid Cap ETF | 0.87% | 0.98% | 1.01% | 1.17% | 1.16% | 0.72% | 1.04% | 1.02% | 1.36% | 0.90% | 1.15% | 0.33% |
SFYX SoFi Next 500 ETF | 1.36% | 1.44% | 1.25% | 1.51% | 1.56% | 0.90% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYX and JHMM have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYX is cheaper at 0.00% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYX is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for JHMM.
SFYX has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 0.87% for JHMM.
SFYX tracks Solactive SoFi US Next 500 Growth Index, while JHMM tracks John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Manulife. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for SFYX and 0.42% for JHMM.
Find the right allocation for SFYX and JHMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer