SFYI vs. XYLD
SFYI (SoFi Social 50 Income ETF) and XYLD (Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. SFYI is actively managed, while XYLD is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFYI charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for XYLD.
Performance
SFYI vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SFYI
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XYLD
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 7.24%
- 1Y
- 17.35%
- 3Y*
- 11.42%
- 5Y*
- 7.92%
- 10Y*
- 8.18%
SFYI vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | -0.91% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 0.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYI and XYLD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYI vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank
SFYI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XYLD
SFYI vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 Income ETF (SFYI) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFYI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.57 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.29 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.16 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYI vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYI drawdown since its inception was -2.10%, smaller than the maximum XYLD drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYI and XYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.10% | -33.46% | +31.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.10% | -0.10% | -2.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -3.69% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.01% | — |
Volatility
SFYI vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYI | XYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 5.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 6.94% | +6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 11.27% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.64% | 14.15% | -0.51% |
SFYI vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYI has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYI vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison
SFYI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.27%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYI SoFi Social 50 Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XYLD Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 10.27% | 10.51% | 11.54% | 10.51% | 13.43% | 9.07% | 7.93% | 5.76% | 7.12% | 5.18% | 3.23% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYI and XYLD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XYLD is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XYLD is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for SFYI.
XYLD has the higher dividend yield at 10.27%, compared with 0.00% for SFYI.
They also come from different issuers: Tidal and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for SFYI and 0.60% for XYLD.
Find the right allocation for SFYI and XYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer