PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYF vs. VEGN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYF vs. VEGN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than VEGN's 27.53% return.


SFYF

1D
0.34%
1M
-1.85%
6M
10.27%
YTD
11.24%
1Y
30.63%
3Y*
29.04%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*

VEGN

1D
-1.55%
1M
-4.19%
6M
26.14%
YTD
27.53%
1Y
39.53%
3Y*
25.53%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. VEGN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
11.24%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%35.83%33.65%8.82%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
27.53%13.71%25.42%38.10%-26.87%26.01%27.72%9.45%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and VEGN is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2019

0.83

The correlation between SFYF and VEGN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFYF vs. VEGN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYF
VEGN

Technology

34.9%
63.2%

Consumer Cyclical

24.6%
1.7%

Communication Services

16.7%
7.8%

Financial Services

7.5%
13.2%

Healthcare

6.8%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.0%
0.1%

Industrials

1.2%
5.0%

Real Estate

1.1%
3.9%

Energy

0.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

0.1%

Technology

SFYF
34.9%
VEGN
63.2%

Consumer Cyclical

SFYF
24.6%
VEGN
1.7%

Communication Services

SFYF
16.7%
VEGN
7.8%

Financial Services

SFYF
7.5%
VEGN
13.2%

Healthcare

SFYF
6.8%
VEGN
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

SFYF
6.0%
VEGN
0.1%

Industrials

SFYF
1.2%
VEGN
5.0%

Real Estate

SFYF
1.1%
VEGN
3.9%

Energy

SFYF
0.7%
VEGN
0.1%

Basic Materials

SFYF

-

VEGN
0.5%

Utilities

SFYF

-

VEGN
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYF vs. VEGN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

VEGN
VEGN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VEGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEGN Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VEGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEGN Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. VEGN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SFYFVEGNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.35

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.23

12.46

-6.23

SFYF vs. VEGN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the VEGN Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and VEGN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. VEGN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than VEGN's maximum drawdown of -34.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and VEGN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYFVEGNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.09%

-34.14%

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

-11.85%

-3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-20.91%

-5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

-33.40%

-22.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.77%

-5.96%

+1.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.40%

-7.52%

-8.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

3.18%

+1.75%

Volatility

SFYF vs. VEGN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) is 6.73%, while US Vegan Climate ETF (VEGN) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that SFYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEGN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYFVEGNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.73%

9.30%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.54%

17.14%

-1.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

19.48%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.38%

20.85%

+8.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.61%

22.99%

+7.62%

SFYF vs. VEGN - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than VEGN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYF vs. VEGN - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than VEGN's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.36%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%
VEGN
US Vegan Climate ETF
0.50%0.51%0.51%0.67%0.81%0.41%0.71%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYF and VEGN have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEGN has higher volatility (9.30%) compared to SFYF (6.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs VEGN's -34.14%.

On 5-year performance, VEGN leads with 15.16% vs 11.94% for SFYF. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SFYF has been the lower-risk option at 6.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VEGN has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for VEGN.

VEGN has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.36% for SFYF.

SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while VEGN tracks US Vegan Climate Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and Beyond Investing. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.60% for VEGN.

VEGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYF and VEGN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer