PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFYF vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFYF vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 14.85% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.


SFYF

1D
-0.85%
1M
8.95%
YTD
14.85%
6M
14.20%
1Y
43.96%
3Y*
36.32%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*

SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFYF vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
14.85%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%35.83%33.65%1.61%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and SPUS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.82

The correlation between SFYF and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

SFYF vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SFYF
SPUS

Technology

38.5%
57.3%

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%
7.3%

Communication Services

13.8%
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
2.9%

Financial Services

5.5%

-

Healthcare

5.5%
11.1%

Industrials

3.5%
7.0%

Energy

2.1%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.4%

Basic Materials

-

3.0%

Utilities

-

0.3%

Technology

SFYF
38.5%
SPUS
57.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SFYF
22.9%
SPUS
7.3%

Communication Services

SFYF
13.8%
SPUS
6.4%

Consumer Defensive

SFYF
6.8%
SPUS
2.9%

Financial Services

SFYF
5.5%
SPUS

-

Healthcare

SFYF
5.5%
SPUS
11.1%

Industrials

SFYF
3.5%
SPUS
7.0%

Energy

SFYF
2.1%
SPUS
3.3%

Real Estate

SFYF
1.2%
SPUS
1.4%

Basic Materials

SFYF

-

SPUS
3.0%

Utilities

SFYF

-

SPUS
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFYF vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFYF vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SFYFSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.49

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.79

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

16.32

-6.67

SFYF vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SFYFSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.86

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.91

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.91

-0.30

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFYFSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.09%

-30.80%

-25.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

-10.66%

-4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-22.82%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

-28.06%

-28.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-0.86%

-0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-6.21%

-10.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.57%

2.47%

+2.10%

Volatility

SFYF vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 5.58% compared to SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) at 4.00%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFYFSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

4.00%

+1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.21%

10.84%

+2.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.74%

14.16%

+4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.28%

19.23%

+10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.68%

21.28%

+9.40%

SFYF vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFYF vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, less than SPUS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF
0.29%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SFYF and SPUS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFYF has higher volatility (5.58%) compared to SPUS (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs SPUS's -30.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 12.34% for SFYF. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, SPUS has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 12.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.

SPUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.29% for SFYF.

SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.45% for SPUS.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYF and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer