SFYF vs. SPIT
SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. SFYF is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SFYF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
SFYF vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 11.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.10% return.
SFYF
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- 6M
- 10.27%
- YTD
- 11.24%
- 1Y
- 30.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.04%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
SPIT
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 18.11%
- YTD
- 27.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFYF vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 11.24% | 1.97% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 27.10% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFYF and SPIT is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFYF vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
SFYF
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SFYF vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFYF | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.23 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFYF vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFYF | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.09% | -12.49% | -43.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.09% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -5.58% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -2.54% | -13.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.93% | — | — |
Volatility
SFYF vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFYF | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.93% | 26.27% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.38% | 26.27% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.61% | 26.27% | +4.34% |
SFYF vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFYF vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than SPIT's 5.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFYF SoFi Social 50 ETF | 0.36% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 1.71% | 1.19% | 0.26% | 0.40% | 0.73% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.65% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFYF and SPIT have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.65%, compared with 0.36% for SFYF.
They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for SFYF and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer