PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SFYF vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SFYF vs. EINC

Last updated Aug 5, 2026
Documentation

SFYF (SoFi Social 50 ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFYF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the SoFi Social 50 Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SFYF returned 10.87%/yr vs 22.67%/yr for EINC. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SFYF charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for EINC.

Performance

SFYF vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFYF achieves a 11.41% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 26.81% return.

SFYF

1D
3.01%
1M
0.57%
6M
14.10%
YTD
11.41%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
17.86%

EINC

1D
-0.31%
1M
2.25%
6M
17.08%
YTD
26.81%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
27.29%
5Y*
22.67%
10Y*
11.23%
ALL TIME*
0.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

EINC

VanEck Energy Income ETF
$754.80K$2.71M$2.24M

SFYF

SoFi Social 50 ETF
$152.71K$195.32K$232.95K

SFYF vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF		11.41%30.00%44.62%56.80%-47.73%35.83%33.65%5.50%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		26.81%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%-19.89%-2.52%

Correlation

The correlation between SFYF and EINC is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.35

The correlation between SFYF and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SFYF vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SFYF
EINC

Technology

37.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

23.3%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Financial Services

8.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.0%

-

Healthcare

6.1%

-

Industrials

3.5%
0.6%

Energy

1.8%
99.5%

Real Estate

1.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Utilities

-

0.5%

Technology

SFYF
37.7%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

SFYF
23.3%
EINC

-

Communication Services

SFYF
10.9%
EINC

-

Financial Services

SFYF
8.5%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

SFYF
7.0%
EINC

-

Healthcare

SFYF
6.1%
EINC

-

Industrials

SFYF
3.5%
EINC
0.6%

Energy

SFYF
1.8%
EINC
99.5%

Real Estate

SFYF
1.3%
EINC

-

Basic Materials

SFYF

-

EINC

-

Utilities

SFYF

-

EINC
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SoFi Social 50 ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with SFYF:
SFYF vs. SFYSFYF vs. VOOSFYF vs. SFYXSFYF vs. VTISFYF vs. XLGSFYF vs. FTECSFYF vs. XLY
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

SFYF vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
SFYF
SFYF Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
SFYF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFYF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFYF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
SFYF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFYF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SFYF vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SFYFEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.40
1.81

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.92
2.49

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.32

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.55

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.41

8.67

-3.26

SFYF vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SFYF Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SFYF and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFYF vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFYF drawdown since its inception was -56.09%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFYF and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SFYFEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.09%

-87.55%

+31.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.18%

-7.89%

-7.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.45%

-16.01%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.09%

-19.87%

-36.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.63%

-3.86%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.34%

-43.82%

+27.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.33%

3.24%

+2.09%

Volatility

SFYF vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

SoFi Social 50 ETF (SFYF) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 5.71%. This indicates that SFYF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SFYFEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

5.71%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.40%

12.53%

+3.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.69%

15.45%

+5.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.44%

19.49%

+9.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.59%

25.33%

+5.26%

SFYF vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFYF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFYF vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

SFYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than EINC's 4.24% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		4.24%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
SFYF
SoFi Social 50 ETF		0.36%0.33%0.31%1.71%1.19%0.26%0.40%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

SFYF and EINC have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SFYF has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to EINC (5.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFYF dropped -56.09% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 22.67% vs 10.87% for SFYF. On fees, SFYF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 5.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 22.67% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SFYF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.36% for SFYF.

SFYF is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. SFYF tracks SoFi Social 50 Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for SFYF and 0.46% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFYF and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer