PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAPN vs. DIVN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAPN vs. DIVN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAPN achieves a -2.38% return, which is significantly lower than DIVN's 14.80% return.


JAPN

1D
0.26%
1M
7.93%
6M
2.43%
YTD
-2.38%
1Y
-8.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.53%

DIVN

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
6M
8.07%
YTD
14.80%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$10.90M$5.41M$2.61M
$244.63K$159.98K$135.76K

JAPN vs. DIVN - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JAPN and DIVN is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAPN vs. DIVN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAPN
JAPN Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
JAPN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAPN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAPN Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
JAPN Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAPN Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAPN vs. DIVN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) and Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAPNDIVNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.39

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.31

4.08

-4.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.51

11.49

-12.00

JAPN vs. DIVN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAPN Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the DIVN Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAPN and DIVN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAPN vs. DIVN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAPN drawdown since its inception was -23.94%, which is greater than DIVN's maximum drawdown of -5.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAPN and DIVN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAPNDIVNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.94%

-5.55%

-18.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.94%

-5.55%

-18.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.16%

-1.39%

-11.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.71%

-1.35%

-9.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.71%

1.97%

+12.74%

Volatility

JAPN vs. DIVN - Volatility Comparison

Horizon Kinetics Japan Owner Operator ETF (JAPN) has a higher volatility of 6.83% compared to Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) at 3.15%. This indicates that JAPN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAPNDIVNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

3.15%

+3.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.88%

7.55%

+9.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.20%

10.52%

+9.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.84%

10.53%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.84%

10.53%

+9.31%

JAPN vs. DIVN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAPN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVN's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAPN vs. DIVN - Dividend Comparison

JAPN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than DIVN's 3.70% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JAPN and DIVN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAPN has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to DIVN (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAPN dropped -23.94% vs DIVN's -5.55%.

On 1-year performance, DIVN leads with 22.54% vs -8.89% for JAPN. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DIVN has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DIVN has performed better with a 22.54% return vs -8.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for JAPN.

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 0.25% for JAPN.

JAPN is categorized as Japan Equities, while DIVN is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for JAPN and 0.70% for DIVN.

DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAPN and DIVN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer