SFTY vs. HBTA
SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and HBTA (Horizon Expedition Plus ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFTY is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Horizon, while HBTA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Horizon. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for HBTA.
Performance
SFTY vs. HBTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than HBTA's 14.07% return.
SFTY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HBTA
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.07%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFTY vs. HBTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 9.84% | 11.73% |
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | 14.07% | 16.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFTY and HBTA is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFTY vs. HBTA — Risk / Return Rank
SFTY
HBTA
SFTY vs. HBTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Horizon Expedition Plus ETF (HBTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFTY | HBTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.91 | +1.20 |
Drawdowns
SFTY vs. HBTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum HBTA drawdown of -26.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and HBTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFTY | HBTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -26.73% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -0.68% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -4.22% | +3.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.80% | — |
Volatility
SFTY vs. HBTA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFTY | HBTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 13.24% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 17.18% | -5.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 24.85% | -13.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 24.85% | -13.21% |
SFTY vs. HBTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than HBTA's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFTY vs. HBTA - Dividend Comparison
SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than HBTA's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HBTA Horizon Expedition Plus ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% |
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, SFTY and HBTA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SFTY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFTY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for HBTA.
HBTA has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.
SFTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while HBTA is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.85% for HBTA.
Find the right allocation for SFTY and HBTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer