PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DIVN vs. MEDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DIVN vs. MEDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DIVN achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than MEDX's 6.93% return.


DIVN

1D
0.02%
1M
-0.30%
6M
10.33%
YTD
13.69%
1Y
19.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MEDX

1D
-0.53%
1M
2.95%
6M
5.83%
YTD
6.93%
1Y
29.12%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DIVN vs. MEDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
13.69%8.11%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
6.93%25.61%

Correlation

The correlation between DIVN and MEDX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.50

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DIVN vs. MEDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DIVN
DIVN Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DIVN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVN Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVN Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

MEDX
MEDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MEDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DIVN vs. MEDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) and Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DIVNMEDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.27

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.78

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.71

7.57

+2.15

DIVN vs. MEDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DIVN Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the MEDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DIVN and MEDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DIVN vs. MEDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DIVN drawdown since its inception was -5.55%, smaller than the maximum MEDX drawdown of -23.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DIVN and MEDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DIVNMEDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.55%

-23.10%

+17.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.55%

-10.54%

+4.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-5.81%

+5.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.39%

-6.58%

+5.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

3.86%

-1.85%

Volatility

DIVN vs. MEDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Horizon Dividend Income ETF (DIVN) is 2.91%, while Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF (MEDX) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that DIVN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DIVNMEDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.91%

6.98%

-4.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.37%

14.14%

-6.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.42%

19.00%

-8.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.44%

17.21%

-6.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.44%

17.21%

-6.77%

DIVN vs. MEDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DIVN has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MEDX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

DIVN vs. MEDX - Dividend Comparison

DIVN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than MEDX's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
DIVN
Horizon Dividend Income ETF
3.45%1.47%0.00%0.00%
MEDX
Horizon Kinetics Medical ETF
1.15%1.23%1.92%4.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


DIVN and MEDX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEDX has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to DIVN (2.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DIVN dropped -5.55% vs MEDX's -23.10%.

On 1-year performance, MEDX leads with 29.12% vs 19.47% for DIVN. On fees, DIVN is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, DIVN has been the lower-risk option at 2.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MEDX has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 19.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVN is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for MEDX.

DIVN has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.15% for MEDX.

DIVN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MEDX is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DIVN and 0.85% for MEDX.

DIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DIVN and MEDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer