SFTY vs. CLSM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for CLSM.

Performance

SFTY vs. CLSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly lower than CLSM's 20.45% return.

SFTY

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 4.71%
• YTD: 9.84%
• 6M: 9.81%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CLSM

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 20.45%
• 6M: 20.19%
• 1Y: 34.21%
• 3Y*: 13.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTY vs. CLSM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF	9.84%	11.73%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	20.45%	9.24%

Correlation

The correlation between SFTY and CLSM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025	0.89

Return for Risk

SFTY vs. CLSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 82
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTY vs. CLSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFTY	CLSM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.11	0.35	+1.77

Drawdowns

SFTY vs. CLSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum CLSM drawdown of -27.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and CLSM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFTY	CLSM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.64%	-27.77%	+19.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.50%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.60%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.38%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.10%	-16.49%	+15.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SFTY	CLSM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.58%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.54%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.64%	12.70%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.64%	12.47%	-0.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.64%	12.47%	-0.83%

SFTY vs. CLSM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSM's 0.82% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFTY vs. CLSM - Dividend Comparison

SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than CLSM's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.75%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF	0.17%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFTY and CLSM in my portfolio?

SFTY and CLSM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SFTY or CLSM?

On fees, SFTY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFTY or CLSM?

SFTY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFTY or CLSM?

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.

What is the main difference between SFTY and CLSM?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and Cabana. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.82% for CLSM.