SFTY vs. BCDF
SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SFTY is a Tactical Allocation fund managed by Horizon, while BCDF is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Horizon. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SFTY charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.
Performance
SFTY vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFTY achieves a 9.84% return, which is significantly higher than BCDF's 3.23% return.
SFTY
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 4.71%
- YTD
- 9.84%
- 6M
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.70%
- YTD
- 3.23%
- 6M
- 4.02%
- 1Y
- 6.26%
- 3Y*
- 14.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SFTY vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 9.84% | 11.73% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 3.23% | 0.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFTY and BCDF is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFTY vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
SFTY
BCDF
SFTY vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFTY | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.39 | +1.72 |
Drawdowns
SFTY vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFTY drawdown since its inception was -8.64%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTY and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFTY | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -27.70% | +19.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -7.63% | +7.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.10% | -9.83% | +8.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility
SFTY vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFTY | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.64% | 14.76% | -3.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 16.94% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.64% | 16.94% | -5.30% |
SFTY vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFTY has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFTY vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
SFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BCDF's 2.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.45% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF | 0.17% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFTY and BCDF have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SFTY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SFTY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.45%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.
SFTY is categorized as Tactical Allocation, while BCDF is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for SFTY and 0.85% for BCDF.
Find the right allocation for SFTY and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer