SFTX vs. TBFG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

SFTX (Horizon International Managed Risk ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFTX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.

Performance

SFTX vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFTX achieves a 18.83% return, which is significantly higher than TBFG's 8.49% return.

SFTX

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 0.36%
• YTD: 18.83%
• 6M: 18.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFG

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.13%
• YTD: 8.49%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 19.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTX vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF	18.83%	1.61%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	8.49%	1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between SFTX and TBFG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025	0.92

Return for Risk

SFTX vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SFTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 65
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTX vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SFTX	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.90	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.63	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	10.98	—

Drawdowns

SFTX vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTX drawdown since its inception was -12.75%, smaller than the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTX and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFTX	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.75%	-13.43%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.83%	-2.04%	-1.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.68%	-1.62%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SFTX	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.81%	10.54%	+12.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.81%	11.17%	+11.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.81%	11.17%	+11.64%

SFTX vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFTX vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

SFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than TBFG's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF	0.21%	0.25%	0.00%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.00%	2.65%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFTX and TBFG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, SFTX and TBFG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SFTX or TBFG?

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFTX or TBFG?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFTX or TBFG?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.21% for SFTX.

What is the main difference between SFTX and TBFG?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for SFTX and 0.42% for TBFG.