SFTX vs. TBFG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SFTX (Horizon International Managed Risk ETF) and TBFG (The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SFTX charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for TBFG.

Performance

SFTX vs. TBFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SFTX achieves a 22.26% return, which is significantly higher than TBFG's 10.44% return.

SFTX

• 1D: -0.29%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 22.26%
• 6M: 24.22%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TBFG

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 10.44%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 24.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTX vs. TBFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF	22.26%	1.61%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	10.44%	0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between SFTX and TBFG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025	0.91

SFTX vs. TBFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SFTX	TBFG
Technology	28.2%	21.5%
Financial Services	16.2%	17.7%
Industrials	12.1%	13.3%
Healthcare	10.1%	8.3%
Basic Materials	8.6%	6.0%
Energy	8.0%	7.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.9%	8.4%
Communication Services	4.5%	6.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	5.8%
Utilities	1.9%	3.4%
Real Estate	0.9%	2.4%

Return for Risk

SFTX vs. TBFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TBFG

TBFG Risk / Return Rank: 75
TBFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
TBFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
TBFG Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TBFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
TBFG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SFTX vs. TBFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SFTX	TBFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.57	1.39	+1.18

Drawdowns

SFTX vs. TBFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTX drawdown since its inception was -12.75%, smaller than the maximum TBFG drawdown of -13.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTX and TBFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	SFTX	TBFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.75%	-13.43%	+0.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.29%	-0.28%	-0.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-1.62%	-1.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.76%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SFTX	TBFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.91%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.00%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.65%	9.73%	+11.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.65%	10.94%	+10.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.65%	10.94%	+10.71%

SFTX vs. TBFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than TBFG's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

SFTX vs. TBFG - Dividend Comparison

SFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than TBFG's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
SFTX Horizon International Managed Risk ETF	0.20%	0.25%	0.00%
TBFG The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF	2.35%	2.65%	2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SFTX and TBFG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, SFTX and TBFG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, SFTX or TBFG?

On fees, TBFG is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SFTX or TBFG?

TBFG is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SFTX or TBFG?

TBFG has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.20% for SFTX.

What is the main difference between SFTX and TBFG?

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and The Brinsmere Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for SFTX and 0.42% for TBFG.