PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SFTX vs. WIMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SFTX vs. WIMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SFTX

1D
0.36%
1M
4.36%
YTD
23.56%
6M
24.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WIMA

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.61%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SFTX vs. WIMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SFTX and WIMA is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026

0.77

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SFTX vs. WIMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon International Managed Risk ETF (SFTX) and WisdomTree International Adaptive Moving Average Fund (WIMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SFTX vs. WIMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SFTX vs. WIMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SFTX drawdown since its inception was -12.75%, which is greater than WIMA's maximum drawdown of -3.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFTX and WIMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SFTXWIMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.75%

-3.33%

-9.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.67%

-0.92%

-1.75%

Volatility

SFTX vs. WIMA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SFTXWIMADifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.52%

16.28%

+6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.52%

16.28%

+6.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.52%

16.28%

+6.24%

SFTX vs. WIMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SFTX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than WIMA's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

SFTX vs. WIMA - Dividend Comparison

SFTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, while WIMA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


SFTX and WIMA have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WIMA is cheaper at 0.42% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WIMA is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for SFTX.

SFTX has the higher dividend yield at 0.20%, compared with 0.00% for WIMA.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for SFTX and 0.42% for WIMA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SFTX and WIMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer