SFSNX vs. TLT
SFSNX (Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both funds - SFSNX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Charles Schwab, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX returned 11.20%/yr vs -1.75%/yr for TLT. At a correlation of -0.25, they often move in opposite directions. SFSNX charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
SFSNX vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 17.14% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX has outperformed TLT with an annualized return of 11.20%, while TLT has yielded a comparatively lower -1.75% annualized return.
SFSNX
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 34.12%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 7.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.20%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- -1.38%
- 5Y*
- -6.53%
- 10Y*
- -1.75%
SFSNX vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 17.14% | 7.66% | 8.99% | 20.15% | -14.79% | 30.91% | 8.49% | 24.44% | -12.26% | 12.84% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 0.27% | 4.25% | -8.05% | 2.77% | -31.23% | -4.60% | 18.15% | 14.12% | -1.61% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and TLT is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2008 | -0.25 |
The correlation between SFSNX and TLT shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFSNX vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
SFSNX
TLT
SFSNX vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFSNX | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.06 | +0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 0.38 | +2.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 0.92 | +10.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than TLT's maximum drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFSNX | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -48.35% | -9.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -7.58% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.91% | -19.18% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -43.70% | +17.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.82% | -48.35% | +3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -40.12% | +40.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -13.84% | +5.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.14% | -0.25% |
Volatility
SFSNX vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.83%. This indicates that SFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFSNX | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 2.83% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | 6.64% | +5.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.42% | 9.68% | +7.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 15.85% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 14.91% | +8.38% |
SFSNX vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than TLT's 4.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 1.16% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 1.37% | 7.05% | 12.27% | 1.42% | 3.66% | 11.55% | 6.88% | 1.86% | 6.37% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.56% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFSNX and TLT have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SFSNX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to TLT (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFSNX dropped -58.32% vs TLT's -48.35%.
SFSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFSNX and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer