SFSNX vs. FNDA
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA).
SFSNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. FNDA is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell RAFI Small Company US. It was launched on Aug 15, 2013.
Performance
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 0.48% | 7.66% | 8.99% | 20.15% | -14.79% | 30.91% | 8.49% | 24.44% | -12.26% | 12.84% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 3.11% | 7.44% | 9.00% | 20.29% | -14.83% | 31.12% | 8.44% | 24.34% | -12.12% | 12.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 0.48% return, which is significantly lower than FNDA's 3.11% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SFSNX having a 9.73% annualized return and FNDA not far ahead at 10.01%.
SFSNX
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -7.88%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.67%
- 5Y*
- 6.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.73%
FNDA
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -5.58%
- YTD
- 3.11%
- 6M
- 4.77%
- 1Y
- 19.91%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 6.25%
- 10Y*
- 10.01%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SFSNX and FNDA have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
SFSNX vs. FNDA — Risk / Return Rank
SFSNX
FNDA
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SFSNX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.79 | 0.91 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 1.41 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.19 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.03 | 1.40 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.98 | 5.33 | -1.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SFSNX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 | 0.91 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.30 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.42 | 0.45 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.45 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and FNDA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%, more than FNDA's 1.21% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 1.36% | 1.36% | 1.71% | 1.37% | 7.05% | 12.27% | 1.42% | 3.66% | 11.55% | 6.88% | 1.86% | 6.37% |
FNDA Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF | 1.21% | 1.22% | 1.53% | 1.37% | 1.38% | 1.15% | 1.31% | 1.38% | 1.64% | 1.30% | 1.18% | 1.33% |
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -58.32%, which is greater than FNDA's maximum drawdown of -44.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and FNDA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFSNX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.32% | -44.64% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.38% | -14.42% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.91% | -25.92% | +0.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.82% | -44.64% | -0.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.29% | -6.96% | -2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.38% | -6.76% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 3.77% | -0.04% |
Volatility
SFSNX vs. FNDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) is 5.81%, while Schwab Fundamental US Small Co. Index ETF (FNDA) has a volatility of 6.37%. This indicates that SFSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SFSNX | FNDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | 6.37% | -0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.50% | 12.74% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.89% | 22.04% | -0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.90% | 21.01% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.25% | 22.36% | +0.89% |