SFSNX vs. ISCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG).
SFSNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. ISCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SFSNX or ISCG.
Performance
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 17.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SFSNX having a 9.22% annualized return and ISCG not far ahead at 9.44%.
SFSNX
12.82%
2.02%
9.70%
25.99%
11.41%
9.22%
ISCG
17.08%
2.35%
11.19%
31.43%
9.08%
9.44%
Key characteristics
| SFSNX | ISCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.42 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.09 | 2.41 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.25 | 1.29 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.19 | 0.32 |
| Martin Ratio | 7.95 | 9.82 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.33% | 3.27% |
| Daily Std Dev | 18.64% | 18.88% |
| Max Drawdown | -62.68% | -100.00% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.37% | -99.99% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and ISCG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, more than ISCG's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.42% | 1.41% | 1.91% | 1.42% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 1.22% | 0.90% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% | 0.56% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -62.68%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and ISCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.