SFSNX vs. ISCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG).
SFSNX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Apr 2, 2007. ISCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SFSNX or ISCG.
Correlation
The correlation between SFSNX and ISCG is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SFSNX:
0.42
ISCG:
0.82
SFSNX:
0.72
ISCG:
1.25
SFSNX:
1.09
ISCG:
1.15
SFSNX:
0.79
ISCG:
0.15
SFSNX:
2.17
ISCG:
4.45
SFSNX:
3.60%
ISCG:
3.45%
SFSNX:
18.47%
ISCG:
18.77%
SFSNX:
-62.68%
ISCG:
-100.00%
SFSNX:
-9.29%
ISCG:
-99.99%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SFSNX achieves a 7.50% return, which is significantly lower than ISCG's 14.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SFSNX has underperformed ISCG with an annualized return of 8.43%, while ISCG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.91% annualized return.
SFSNX
7.50%
-7.73%
7.95%
7.30%
9.33%
8.43%
ISCG
14.47%
-5.73%
11.49%
14.37%
7.74%
8.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFSNX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison
SFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ISCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFSNX Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund | 0.00% | 1.37% | 1.22% | 1.35% | 1.42% | 1.41% | 1.91% | 1.42% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 1.22% | 0.90% |
ISCG iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 0.92% | 0.62% | 0.10% | 0.27% | 0.40% | 0.52% | 1.19% | 0.64% | 0.56% | 0.53% |
Drawdowns
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFSNX drawdown since its inception was -62.68%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFSNX and ISCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SFSNX vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Fundamental US Small Company Index Fund (SFSNX) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 5.43%. This indicates that SFSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.