SFPAX vs. RMBKX
SFPAX (Saratoga Financial Service Fund) and RMBKX (RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund) are both Financials Equities funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, SFPAX returned 9.04%/yr vs 11.37%/yr for RMBKX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SFPAX charges 3.81%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for RMBKX.
Performance
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, SFPAX has underperformed RMBKX with an annualized return of 9.04%, while RMBKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.
SFPAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 2.51%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.28%
RMBKX
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 20.12%
- 1Y
- 43.23%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.68%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 7.00% | 26.05% | 10.58% | -14.36% | 31.17% | -5.81% | 29.63% | -19.23% | 19.28% |
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 20.12% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between SFPAX and RMBKX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012 | 0.78 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SFPAX and RMBKX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SFPAX vs. RMBKX — Risk / Return Rank
SFPAX
RMBKX
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) and RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SFPAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.34 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 4.10 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 11.27 | -11.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SFPAX drawdown since its inception was -71.98%, which is greater than RMBKX's maximum drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SFPAX and RMBKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SFPAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.98% | -55.45% | -16.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.86% | -9.48% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.92% | -24.98% | +7.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.51% | -44.33% | +16.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.64% | -55.45% | +9.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -1.91% | -0.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.91% | -10.97% | -9.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.45% | -1.13% |
Volatility
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saratoga Financial Service Fund (SFPAX) is 0.00%, while RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a volatility of 5.72%. This indicates that SFPAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMBKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SFPAX | RMBKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 5.72% | -5.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.96% | 13.29% | -11.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.20% | 20.41% | -11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 24.66% | -5.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.51% | 27.18% | -4.67% |
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SFPAX has a 3.81% expense ratio, which is higher than RMBKX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
SFPAX vs. RMBKX - Dividend Comparison
SFPAX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 5.18% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% |
SFPAX Saratoga Financial Service Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% | 5.05% | 5.71% | 5.03% | 4.18% | 7.10% | 22.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SFPAX and RMBKX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBKX has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to SFPAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SFPAX dropped -71.98% vs RMBKX's -55.45%.
RMBKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SFPAX and RMBKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer