RMBKX vs. SBFAX
Compare and contrast key facts about RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX).
RMBKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 7, 1999. SBFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Nov 16, 1998.
Performance
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | -0.36% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | -8.02% | 4.29% | 24.86% | 1.50% | -13.99% | 30.74% | 0.14% | 29.11% | -14.94% | 14.65% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than SBFAX's -8.02% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBKX has outperformed SBFAX with an annualized return of 9.85%, while SBFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.43% annualized return.
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
SBFAX
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -5.19%
- YTD
- -8.02%
- 6M
- -7.76%
- 1Y
- -5.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 8.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SBFAX's 1.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMBKX vs. SBFAX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBKX
SBFAX
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMBKX | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | -0.26 | +1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | -0.24 | +1.51 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 0.97 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | -0.53 | +2.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | -1.39 | +5.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMBKX | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | -0.26 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.15 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBKX and SBFAX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Dividend Comparison
RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than SBFAX's 15.77% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
SBFAX 1919 Financial Services Fund | 15.77% | 14.51% | 10.60% | 10.93% | 2.40% | 4.83% | 5.09% | 3.84% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 2.93% | 7.25% |
Drawdowns
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than SBFAX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and SBFAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBKX | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -49.33% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -11.95% | -0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.33% | -33.94% | -10.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.45% | -43.58% | -11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -10.80% | +2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -9.53% | -1.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 4.54% | -0.16% |
Volatility
RMBKX vs. SBFAX - Volatility Comparison
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to 1919 Financial Services Fund (SBFAX) at 3.70%. This indicates that RMBKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMBKX | SBFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 3.70% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 10.91% | +4.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 18.16% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 19.42% | +5.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 22.85% | +4.25% |